Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
51
Operating heavy machinery is a highly specialised skill that completely changes how your brain processes spatial awareness, momentum, and mechanical limitations. Many individuals working in the agricultural sector or heavy construction spend thousands of hours operating massive combine harvesters, articulated dump trucks, and incredibly heavy front-end loaders. These blue-collar professionals completely understand how to manage massive diesel engines, monitor complex hydraulic pressures, and safely move equipment that weighs more than a small house. Yet, despite possessing this massive bank of mechanical knowledge, many remain locked into strictly seasonal work or geographically limited construction contracts. They already hold the physical aptitude required to control heavy machinery, but they lack the exact legal paperwork required to completely commercialise those skills on the national highway system.

Making the professional transition from the dirt job site to the paved interstate requires securing an unrestricted CDL Class A License, which officially formalises your mechanical skills for public traffic. Driving a massive tractor pulling a heavy plow across an empty field certainly teaches you how to manage a wide turning radius, but it does not prepare you for navigating an eighty-thousand-pound combination vehicle through a crowded urban intersection. The commercial license acts as a highly specific translation tool, taking your existing raw mechanical ability and strictly formatting it to comply with federal highway safety regulations. You are no longer just making sure the equipment does not sink into the mud; you are now actively calculating safe stopping distances at sixty-five miles per hour while surrounded by unpredictable civilian drivers.

The practice yard is where the transition from off-road operator to highway professional truly begins to take shape. While a construction worker might already know how to smoothly back up a heavy dump truck, backing a highly articulated fifty-three-foot trailer requires a completely different type of reverse logic. The trailer pivots on the fifth wheel, meaning you must turn the steering wheel in the opposite direction you want the rear of the trailer to travel. For someone already highly comfortable around heavy equipment, this learning curve is typically much shorter than it is for a complete novice. The physical coordination and lack of intimidation are already firmly established; the student simply needs to learn the specific reference points and strict visual scanning techniques required by state examiners.

The most significant adjustment for an experienced machinery operator frequently involves the intense memorisation required for the legal pre-trip inspection. On a farm, checking the equipment might simply involve kicking the tyres and checking the oil dipstick before starting the day's work. On the commercial highway, the federal government strictly demands a highly detailed, systematic verbal inspection of over one hundred individual components, including complex pneumatic air brake chambers and highly specific steering linkages. You must completely abandon informal habits and strictly adopt the rigid, highly documented safety protocols mandated by the department of transportation. This intense regulatory compliance is exactly what separates a casual equipment operator from a highly certified, legally protected transport professional.

Once the legal paperwork is completely secured, the financial difference between operating off-road equipment and hauling highway freight becomes incredibly apparent. While agricultural and construction work is frequently subject to severe weather delays and off-season layoffs, the national supply chain requires the constant movement of highway freight every single day of the year. By successfully upgrading your credentials, you completely transform your physical labour into a highly stable, completely recession-proof career with a massive earning ceiling. You take the exact same blue-collar work ethic and mechanical respect you have always possessed, but you actively place it into a massive national market that desperately wants to pay top dollar for your specific abilities.

Conclusion

Agricultural and construction workers already possess the raw mechanical aptitude required to control massive heavy equipment. By securing the proper commercial credentials, these professionals can actively translate their existing blue-collar skills into a highly stable, incredibly profitable career in the national transport sector.

Call to Action

Stop limiting your earning potential to seasonal contracts and start commercialising your heavy equipment experience for the open highway today. Gain the exact regulatory knowledge and precise backing skills required to pass the state examination and upgrade your professional future.

Visit: https://doabatruckdrivingschool.com/cdl-class-a-license/

52
This is a reference to what might be another instance of this problem:


When working on builds for Fedora ([url]https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sharkcz/danny/build/10959184/[/url], details are in the builder-live.log files), I have noticed that libtool version 2.6.2 present in Rawhide fails the build of the codesnippets plugin after the tinyxml LIBADD was removed from its Makefile.am in revision 13996. System tinyxml library is used in the builds. I have confirmed that with libtool downgraded to 2.5.4 the build runs OK. AFAICT other plugins still use the LIBADD mechanism. Likely some change in libtool is causing this ...

Maybe something related to this discussion: [url=https://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,26338.msg179012.html#msg179012]Faild to build C::B with github action with latest wxWidgets 3.3.3[/url]

It is also related to the tinyxml library and the linker issue.

I worked all the way back to svn 13733 and found no changes in the Makefile.am file. So it has to be something that wasn't deleted, but needs to be added.

It's suggested to change Makefile.am for codesnippets to:

Quote
libcodesnippets_la_SOURCES = codesnippets.cpp \
       codesnippetstreectrl.cpp \
--- a/src/plugins/contrib/envvars/Makefile.am
+++ b/src/plugins/contrib/envvars/Makefile.am
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
 libenvvars_la_LDFLAGS = @MODULE_SHARED_LDFLAGS@ -version-info 0:1:0 -no-undefined -avoid-version
 
 libenvvars_la_LIBADD = ../../../sdk/libcodeblocks.la \
-         $(WX_LIBS)
+         $(WX_LIBS) \
+         $(CB_TINYXML_LIBS)
 
in forum message below:

https://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,26338.msg179028.html#msg179028


Can anyone tell me what I need to run to test that this would not screw up anything else on linux or windows.
53
Nightly builds / Re: The 06 September 2026 build (14003) is out.
« Last post by Pecan on September 09, 2026, 06:09:36 pm »
When working on builds for Fedora (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sharkcz/danny/build/10959184/, details are in the builder-live.log files), I have noticed that libtool version 2.6.2 present in Rawhide fails the build of the codesnippets plugin after the tinyxml LIBADD was removed from its Makefile.am in revision 13996. System tinyxml library is used in the builds. I have confirmed that with libtool downgraded to 2.5.4 the build runs OK. AFAICT other plugins still use the LIBADD mechanism. Likely some change in libtool is causing this ...

Working all the way back to svn 13733, the Makefile.am for codesnippets plugin has never been changed.
So it's not something in the file that has been deleted.
It must be something that needs to be added.
I'll continue the conversation on forrum at " Faild to build C::B with github action with latest wxWidgets 3.3.3
" which may be the answer.
54
Nightly builds / Re: The 06 September 2026 build (14003) is out.
« Last post by ollydbg on September 09, 2026, 03:36:50 pm »
When working on builds for Fedora (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sharkcz/danny/build/10959184/, details are in the builder-live.log files), I have noticed that libtool version 2.6.2 present in Rawhide fails the build of the codesnippets plugin after the tinyxml LIBADD was removed from its Makefile.am in revision 13996. System tinyxml library is used in the builds. I have confirmed that with libtool downgraded to 2.5.4 the build runs OK. AFAICT other plugins still use the LIBADD mechanism. Likely some change in libtool is causing this ...

Maybe something related to this discussion: Faild to build C::B with github action with latest wxWidgets 3.3.3

It is also related to the tinyxml library and the linker issue.
55
Nightly builds / Re: The 06 September 2026 build (14003) is out.
« Last post by Pecan on September 09, 2026, 03:54:37 am »
When working on builds for Fedora (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sharkcz/danny/build/10959184/, details are in the builder-live.log files), I have noticed that libtool version 2.6.2 present in Rawhide fails the build of the codesnippets plugin after the tinyxml LIBADD was removed from its Makefile.am in revision 13996. System tinyxml library is used in the builds. I have confirmed that with libtool downgraded to 2.5.4 the build runs OK. AFAICT other plugins still use the LIBADD mechanism. Likely some change in libtool is causing this ...

Most likely my error. I'll do some comparison to see how I erred.
Or maybe you could tell me what it is that I can fix because I'm not very Linux savvy.
56
Nightly builds / Re: The 06 September 2026 build (14003) is out.
« Last post by Xaviou on September 08, 2026, 08:18:51 pm »
Hi.
I am still working on making the Ubuntu-26.04 version (I've made some progress, but there are still problems).
It seems I've found a solution : the last build completed successfully.   :)

Regards
Xav'
57
Nightly builds / Re: The 06 September 2026 build (14003) is out.
« Last post by SharkCZ on September 08, 2026, 01:42:48 pm »
When working on builds for Fedora (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sharkcz/danny/build/10959184/, details are in the builder-live.log files), I have noticed that libtool version 2.6.2 present in Rawhide fails the build of the codesnippets plugin after the tinyxml LIBADD was removed from its Makefile.am in revision 13996. System tinyxml library is used in the builds. I have confirmed that with libtool downgraded to 2.5.4 the build runs OK. AFAICT other plugins still use the LIBADD mechanism. Likely some change in libtool is causing this ...
58
Nightly builds / Re: The 06 September 2026 build (14003) is out.
« Last post by ThierryD on September 08, 2026, 12:44:36 pm »
Hi Xaviou,

Good job, last "nightly" build version 14003 can be installed with success on Linux Mint 22.3 Zena 64b.

Just to be precise, recently I have must reinstall this OS ... after "bad" operation ... and with CodeBlocks some warning(s) must be signaled

After reinstall, my OS environment is "very clean", but first warning : you must don't install CB proposed by default (very old version 20.03), because
I'm not success to upgrade to version 25.03 ...

I donwload all deb packages of CB version 25.03 from Internet in "one tarball" : codeblocks_25.03_amd64_debian12.tar.xz

After decompress in "special directory" and move it, you can install by : "sudo dpkg -i *.deb"

Last operation : declare your ppa, and update your list of packages :

"sudo add-apt-repository ppa:x-psoud/cbnb
sudo apt update"

Second warning, don't proceed by "sudo apt upgrade" because list of deb package don't change after this command ...

Wait (some seconds!), and last version of nightly build of CB appear in "Update manager" of Linux Mint 22.3, and you can click on this to install it.

Regards.




   
59
Nightly builds / Re: The 06 September 2026 build (14003) is out.
« Last post by Xaviou on September 08, 2026, 11:11:47 am »
Hi.

32 bits version for Windows (and also 64 bits version) can be downloaded from my website.
I made both a wxWidgets-3.2.11 and wxWidgets-3.3.3 linked versions

Debian Trixie (64 bits) and Bookworm (32 and 64 bits) can be installed from my repo
The corresponding unsigned deb files can also be downloaded from the website page linked above.

Ubuntu-22.04 and 24.04 versions can be installed from my ppa (they are available for both amd64 and arm64 architectures).

I am still working on making the Ubuntu-26.04 version (I've made some progress, but there are still problems).

Regards
Xav'
60
Help / Re: Can't build code blocks: Zip file structure invalid
« Last post by stahta01 on September 07, 2026, 08:08:44 pm »
you can download zip.exe into the Msys2 file structure with

pacman -S zip

Note when running this zip version, when zip.exe is in a Codeblocks project file you have to exchange the backslashes (\) with forward slashes (/) in the pathnames of files in the argument lists of the zip.exe command.

You also likely need to fix the wildcard "*" in the zip commands.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10