Recent Posts

31

Development / Re: It's year 2026, so I think some text like: 2024-2025 can be updated to 2026

« Last post by jetdosage on October 23, 2026, 12:55:52 pm »

I agree that migration to git is a great idea. It  could be a game changer.  svn is not used widely. Git is superior for collaboration by design as well as tools like github or gitlab.

I think moving to github/gitlab could bring in more developers as well, hence more features/ bug fixes. Also it allows us  to upstream local changes easily by creating a pull request instead of creating a patch against an svn trunk version and uploading it to sourceforge via ticket. Now developers are not much familiar with the svn workflow.

 Hi c::b developers, could you please consider moving codeblocks to github/gitlab basketball stars online?

Also it is a nice idea to move to a later version of c++.

Please let me know if I can do any help with these as I would like to help as code::blocks has helped me a lot.

I agree, moving to GitHub would make contributions easier and potentially attract more developers. Hopefully, the team considers it!

32

Nightly builds / Re: The 07 October 2026 build (14050) is out.

« Last post by denimjeans2007 on October 22, 2026, 08:31:06 pm »

fixed:

Hi everyone,

 Last working release was SVN 13855

I'm having an issue with custom project templates in Code::Blocks. This happens with language types (C, C++, and ASM).
When creating a new project from a saved user template, Code::Blocks creates folders instead of the actual source files (e.g., a folder named main.cpp or main.asm).
...

This is now a known bug (Ticket #1661https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/1661/ ) and will be fixed with SVN14057 and later.

33

Nightly builds / Re: The 07 October 2026 build (14050) is out.

« Last post by ThierryD on October 22, 2026, 06:16:59 pm »

Hello,

Sorry, too me !

I retry today to launch CB on Ubuntu 26.04 64b managed by WSL (last version) on Windows 11 Family 26H2 64b ... but after many "sudp apt update & sudo apt upgrade" (.ie. with "xorg", "systemd", "xz" changed .... too long to enumerate ...).

On W11, no problem, CB version "nigthly" 14050 work perfectly ...

But, on Ubuntu, I constat that after launch CB (last version CB "nigthly" 14050 too), CB open like usual ("Welcome" window), but nothing can be realize after that with "mouse" ...
You can move on this "Welcome" window of CB, but nothing click on selected menu proposed or simply on "Exit" button ("x" button on upper right of this window).
YOU CAN'T EXIT properly of CB and it's true to all other Win32 windows.
One only solution to exit "CTRL+ALT+SUPP" and force "Disconnect user".

Many tries, and problem persist.

Just to be precise, I can launch by example "Firefox" explorer into session WSL Ubuntu 26.04 64b without difficulty.
It's like if CB trap all mouse events ... but no activate actions waiting.

Help me.
 
Sorry, maybe hard to reproduct.

Many thank's.

Thierry.

34

General (but related to Code::Blocks) / Re: Please patch PHP2Shell before this forum gets hacked

« Last post by ollydbg on October 22, 2026, 01:25:44 pm »

I will send an email to our site manager about this issue, thanks.

35

General (but related to Code::Blocks) / Re: Welcome Newcomers - PLEASE READ!!!

« Last post by 1fuhd on October 22, 2026, 07:50:22 am »

here I am

36

General (but related to Code::Blocks) / Re: crash at copy&paste on wsl

« Last post by Kayn on October 21, 2026, 05:31:17 pm »

Hi,
I'm happy to confirm that the proposed fix is effective. Works like a charm  👍

Kayn

37

General (but related to Code::Blocks) / Please patch PHP2Shell before this forum gets hacked

« Last post by Михаил Агарков on October 21, 2026, 04:15:16 pm »

A new vulnerability in PHP allows remote code execution. As a result, all active websites that use PHP have temporarily shut down their site to protect themselves until a patch is out. From what I understand, this forum also uses PHP. Please take action before it gets nuked.

https://www.php.net/archive/2026.php#2026-10-21-5
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-109618
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-109619

38

Development / Re: svn rev 13798 issue?

« Last post by Miguel Gimenez on October 20, 2026, 11:31:14 am »

Profile spammer reported to moderator.

39

General (but related to Code::Blocks) / Re: Why official Binary releases don't need mingwmxxx.dll to run?

« Last post by Miguel Gimenez on October 20, 2026, 11:30:11 am »

Reincident spammer reported to moderator.

40

Development / Re: svn rev 13798 issue?

« Last post by incorrectpa on October 20, 2026, 09:04:19 am »

I agree that the CODEBLOCKS macro seems unnecessary here if it isn't actually needed. Keeping the changes simple and consistent would make the code easier to maintain. Thanks for pointing this out!