Recent Posts

1

Help / Re: .f90 and .f95 files?

« Last post by Miguel Gimenez on Yesterday at 08:58:55 pm »

Probably the extension is related to the Fortran standard used (1990 or 1995), for more information you should ask in a Fortran forum or ask the plugin creator, darmar.

2

Help / Re: Cannot find the compiler

« Last post by Miguel Gimenez on Yesterday at 08:56:50 pm »

Go to Settings -> Compiler, select the "Toolchain executables" tab and fill the controls with your compiler's location (use where gcc.exe in the cmd prompt) and program's names.

3

Help / Cannot find the compiler

« Last post by Lyta on Yesterday at 05:44:25 pm »

I've installed this compiler : https://www.equation.com/servlet/equation.cmd?fa=fortran 15.2.0
When i type in gfortran -- version in a cmd prompt it says:
GNU Fortran (GCC) 15.2.0
Copyright (C) 2025 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

But when i select the GNU fortran compiler in CodeBlocks it gives this message when i try to build and run:
The compiler's setup (GNU Fortran Compiler)  is invalid, so Code::Blocks cannot find/run the compiler.
  Probably the toolchain path within the compiler options is not setup correctly?!
  Do you have a compiler installed?

What compiler do i actually have installed? I dont understand the difference between the mingw compiler and the one i actually have? Under the toolchain paths it shows for the mingw executables, but i don't think it's the one i actually have, i installed the compiler i linked earlier before codeblocks.

4

Help / .f90 and .f95 files?

« Last post by Lyta on Yesterday at 05:05:18 pm »

When i make a new fortran project it generates both a main.f90 and main.f95 file, but the .f95 file is empty.

Why does it make both files? And what is the difference?

5

Development / Re: special handling of the macro replacement ""?

« Last post by ollydbg on February 13, 2026, 03:43:20 pm »

Committed in r13786.

I think supporting the unified cbp file is an important feature.

6

Development / Re: CVE-2020-37121 - buffer overflow exploit

« Last post by killerbot on February 12, 2026, 07:49:01 pm »

Probably all programs compiled with SEH ten years ago are affected, but good luck opening a M3U with C::B  .

that would be nice though :-)

7

Development / Re: CVE-2020-37121 - buffer overflow exploit

« Last post by Miguel Gimenez on February 12, 2026, 04:31:43 pm »

Probably all programs compiled with SEH ten years ago are affected, but good luck opening a M3U with C::B  .

8

Development / CVE-2020-37121 - buffer overflow exploit

« Last post by SharkCZ on February 12, 2026, 02:51:51 pm »

Seems https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-37121 about a buffer overflow related exploit got published last week, but I can't find any additional information. Does anybody know what it is about? I can't see a connection between a crafted M3U playlist and C::B.

9

Using Code::Blocks / Re: crash when I try to open a wxsmith file under C::B against wx 3.3.1

« Last post by ollydbg on February 12, 2026, 03:00:30 am »

Hi, I can also confirm the r13785 fixed the crash issue.

Thanks for your work and testing.

10

Nightly builds / Re: The 09 February 2026 build (13785) is out.

« Last post by Xaviou on February 10, 2026, 08:43:41 pm »

Hi.

32 bits version for Windows can be downloaded from my website.

Debian Trixie (64 bits) and Bookworm (32 and 64 bits) can be installed from my repo
The corresponding unsigned deb files can also be downloaded from the website page linked above.

Ubuntu-22.04, 24.10 and 25.10 versions can be installed from my ppa (they are now available for both amd64 and arm64 architectures).

Regards
Xav'