Recent Posts

1

Development / Re: SVN14057 - UserTemplates - annoying bug - diff patch

« Last post by denimjeans2007 on Today at 12:25:11 am »

update: next ticket 1663 opened: https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/1663 incl the patch

2

Development / SVN14057 - UserTemplates - annoying bug - diff patch

« Last post by denimjeans2007 on October 24, 2026, 10:17:57 pm »

Hi everyone, I have found an annoying bug which prevents users from using their own templates.
It's described here:
https://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,26379.15.html
and i opened a ticket #1661 https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/1661/. The bug should have been fixedwith 14057 but it is not. I have checked the code and found the attached solution working. Tested / compiled with SVN 14057, the bug is gone when using the attached patch. Since I dont know how to contribute the patch to the developers, I am posting it here, in the hope that someone from the developers will review it and if thats fine, implement it.

Regards,
OktayO

3

Using Code::Blocks / Re: Running Code::blocks on Android devices

« Last post by Olckolthy5740 on October 24, 2026, 02:38:06 pm »

Hello Redwan from Brazil!!!!
 Mr. Redwan, I want to help you and develop a solution for Android. I have passed the same on Android and want codeblocks on this platform. If you have interest, you can tell me on reddit (Fuzzy-Remove-1493) or in my email (Luis1435@proton.me).  It will be a pleasure to solve this problem, and besides, we can be recognized for our work. I'm good with C/C++ and other languages, so it will be great. I hope you (and/or other people) will help with the development of Code::Blocks on Android.

Sorry if my English is wrong, i'm not good in this idiome.

Atenciosamente Cido do Pastel.

4

Development / Re: It's year 2026, so I think some text like: 2024-2025 can be updated to 2026

« Last post by Miguel Gimenez on October 23, 2026, 05:44:18 pm »

Spam reported to moderator.

5

Development / Re: cbp2make does not contain a Makefile.am?

« Last post by Miguel Gimenez on October 23, 2026, 05:43:42 pm »

Spam from @jetdosage reported to moderator.

6

Development / Re: cbp2make does not contain a Makefile.am?

« Last post by stahta01 on October 23, 2026, 03:46:51 pm »

I would prefer the adding of Makefile.am instead of my cbp2make.cbp.mak.unix hack I had added to MSys2 package.

Tim S.

7

Nightly builds / Re: The 07 October 2026 build (14050) is out.

« Last post by ThierryD on October 23, 2026, 02:51:11 pm »

Many thank.

8

Development / Re: cbp2make does not contain a Makefile.am?

« Last post by jetdosage on October 23, 2026, 01:01:21 pm »

Hi, when I looked at the

https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/blob/master/mingw-w64-codeblocks/PKGBUILD 2048

I see such code snippet:

Code

  cp -R ${srcdir}/${_realname}_${pkgver}/src/tools/cbp2make/ "${srcdir}"/build-${MSYSTEM}/
  cd "${srcdir}"/build-${MSYSTEM}/cbp2make
  if check_option "debug" "n"; then
    make CC=${CC} CXX=${CXX} LD=${CXX} --jobs=1 -f cbp2make.cbp.mak.unix release
  else
    make CC=${CC} CXX=${CXX} LD=${CXX} --jobs=1 -f cbp2make.cbp.mak.unix debug
  fi

So, do we need to add a Makefile.am?

I see other tools in this folder:  src/tools, such as src/tools/cb_share_config and src/tools/CBLauncher, they all have a Makefile.am, but why cbp2make does not?

Thanks.

Good question! Adding a Makefile.am could improve consistency, but it depends on how cbp2make is built and maintained.

9

Development / Re: It's year 2026, so I think some text like: 2024-2025 can be updated to 2026

« Last post by jetdosage on October 23, 2026, 12:55:52 pm »

I agree that migration to git is a great idea. It  could be a game changer.  svn is not used widely. Git is superior for collaboration by design as well as tools like github or gitlab.

I think moving to github/gitlab could bring in more developers as well, hence more features/ bug fixes. Also it allows us  to upstream local changes easily by creating a pull request instead of creating a patch against an svn trunk version and uploading it to sourceforge via ticket. Now developers are not much familiar with the svn workflow.

 Hi c::b developers, could you please consider moving codeblocks to github/gitlab basketball stars online?

Also it is a nice idea to move to a later version of c++.

Please let me know if I can do any help with these as I would like to help as code::blocks has helped me a lot.

I agree, moving to GitHub would make contributions easier and potentially attract more developers. Hopefully, the team considers it!

10

Nightly builds / Re: The 07 October 2026 build (14050) is out.

« Last post by denimjeans2007 on October 22, 2026, 08:31:06 pm »

fixed:

Hi everyone,

 Last working release was SVN 13855

I'm having an issue with custom project templates in Code::Blocks. This happens with language types (C, C++, and ASM).
When creating a new project from a saved user template, Code::Blocks creates folders instead of the actual source files (e.g., a folder named main.cpp or main.asm).
...

This is now a known bug (Ticket #1661https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/1661/ ) and will be fixed with SVN14057 and later.