1
General (but related to Code::Blocks) / Re: Incorrect compiler path
« Last post by Miguel Gimenez on Today at 11:53:48 am »Profile spammer reported to moderator.
News:
When registered with our forums, feel free to send a "here I am" post here to differ human beings from SPAM bots.
Recent Posts
2
General (but related to Code::Blocks) / Incorrect compiler path
« Last post by icksunlucky on Today at 09:39:32 am »Hi everyone,
I'm having trouble setting up the compiler in Code::Blocks and I keep running into what يبدو like an incorrect compiler path issue.
When I try to build or run a project, I get an error saying that the compiler cannot be found (or the build fails immediately). It seems like Code::Blocks is pointing to the wrong location for the compiler.
How can I correctly set or fix the compiler path?
I'm having trouble setting up the compiler in Code::Blocks and I keep running into what يبدو like an incorrect compiler path issue.
When I try to build or run a project, I get an error saying that the compiler cannot be found (or the build fails immediately). It seems like Code::Blocks is pointing to the wrong location for the compiler.
How can I correctly set or fix the compiler path?
3
General (but related to Code::Blocks) / Re: Thanks for a great IDE
« Last post by groceryprotest on Today at 05:10:32 am »Code::Blocks truly shares my experience with Linux Mint + LMDE. I'm willing to research and learn more to fully utilize its features and functionalities.
4
Nightly builds / Re: The 09 April 2026 build (13831) is out.
« Last post by ollydbg on Today at 03:48:21 am »
I used a prototype of Andrew Cott's which was based on the layout by Ofuscated.
OK.
I see one issue:
InstallDebuggerMI/InstallDebuggerMI.depend
I think this file should not be put in the code repo. Maybe we can put the code in our trunk.
5
Nightly builds / Re: The 09 April 2026 build (13831) is out.
« Last post by Pecan on Today at 03:19:32 am »Hi, Pecan, nice work. The MI protocol certainly has more advantages.
If I remember correctly, one of our developer OBF has wrote an GDB/MI plugin several years ago, but that plugin has never put in the trunk code. He said it was not full functional.
I looked at your code repo, and I'm not sure what is the relationship with OBF's version, thanks.
I used a prototype of Andrew Cott's which was based on the layout by Ofuscated.
6
Nightly builds / Re: The 09 April 2026 build (13831) is out.
« Last post by ollydbg on Today at 02:44:59 am »Hi, Pecan, nice work. The MI protocol certainly has more advantages.
If I remember correctly, one of our developer OBF has wrote an GDB/MI plugin several years ago, but that plugin has never put in the trunk code. He said it was not full functional.
I looked at your code repo, and I'm not sure what is the relationship with OBF's version, thanks.
If I remember correctly, one of our developer OBF has wrote an GDB/MI plugin several years ago, but that plugin has never put in the trunk code. He said it was not full functional.
I looked at your code repo, and I'm not sure what is the relationship with OBF's version, thanks.
7
Plugins development / Re: cbTerminal plugin to access terminal from the bottom panel for Linux ( wxGtk )
« Last post by ollydbg on Today at 02:22:19 am »Hi, there are some news about this topic, it support all platforms(Win, Mac, Linux)
wxTerminalEmulator
This is by CodeLite's author Eranif.
https://github.com/eranif/wxTerminalEmulator
wxTerminalEmulator
This is by CodeLite's author Eranif.
https://github.com/eranif/wxTerminalEmulator
8
Nightly builds / Re: The 09 April 2026 build (13831) is out.
« Last post by Pecan on Yesterday at 08:27:35 pm »Installation Guide: Debugger GDB/MI Plugin
A CodeBlocks plugin using the machine interface of the GDB debugger.
For Code::Blocks Nightly Build 260409_rev13831_win64 only.
Download github binary zip
Source is available at github Source
1. Preparation
2. Installation
3. Configuration
After installation, go to Settings->Debugger->GDB/MI default
4. Usage
Go to MainMenu->Debug->Active Debuggers and select GDB/MI default.
Report issues in this thread with your Nightly Build date and OS.
A CodeBlocks plugin using the machine interface of the GDB debugger.
For Code::Blocks Nightly Build 260409_rev13831_win64 only.
Download github binary zip
Source is available at github Source
1. Preparation
- Ensure Code::Blocks is not running.
- Extract the ZIP contents into a temporary folder.
- Note: While installing, the .exe, .dll, and .zip files must stay together.
2. Installation
- Run InstallDebuggerMI.exe.
- Select your Code::Blocks Nightly folder when prompted.
- Constraint: Your CB Nightly version date and revision must match the install zips file name.
- Installing into a mismatched nightly version will cause it to stall and crash.
3. Configuration
After installation, go to Settings->Debugger->GDB/MI default
- Set the executable Path: Browse to your gdb.exe.
- Verify the other options meet your requirements.
- Click on the Ok button.
4. Usage
Go to MainMenu->Debug->Active Debuggers and select GDB/MI default.
Report issues in this thread with your Nightly Build date and OS.
9
Development / Re: wxSmith : add option for Create function in inhereited cases
« Last post by LR83 on Yesterday at 11:12:06 am »Great 
Removing the line instead of simply replacing it with a comment requires more work. We need to remove all the code that builds this line and it is not so easy.
That's why I simply add a "//" at the beginning of the line to comment it.
Removing the line instead of simply replacing it with a comment requires more work. We need to remove all the code that builds this line and it is not so easy.
That's why I simply add a "//" at the beginning of the line to comment it.
10
Development / Re: wxSmith : add option for Create function in inhereited cases
« Last post by ollydbg on April 25, 2026, 01:43:18 pm »It is in our svn now, thanks.
BTW: I think comment out the "Create" function could be changed to "remove this line" if the option is "false". But I'm not sure how to do that.
BTW: I think comment out the "Create" function could be changed to "remove this line" if the option is "false". But I'm not sure how to do that.