1
Using Code::Blocks / Re: Revisit of internal comands used by CB to build on Win32 and proposals evolution
« Last post by Wkerry on Today at 08:55:51 am »Unordered:
Executive summary is?
Executive proposal is?
Executive problem this is solving is?
Which of the compilers in a..j are still supported? No
The file is 1862 lines and you expect C::B devs to read and understand the file without explaining your "memo/revist" notes/ramblings/etc?
There is no C::B proposal as codes changes need to be supplied as patches and I cannot quickly see any patches in the txt file.
If there are manual changes then these are in separate SVN directory on Sourceforge that patches should be supplied for.
If ther are wiki pages then see if you can update/add pages.
Overall IMHO 2c worth of feedback is that for ANY open source project you would like to contribute to you need to fit in with the way the project works in order to get changes included otherwise your changes will end up in the bit bucket.
Executive summary is?
Executive proposal is?
Executive problem this is solving is?
Which of the compilers in a..j are still supported? No
The file is 1862 lines and you expect C::B devs to read and understand the file without explaining your "memo/revist" notes/ramblings/etc?
There is no C::B proposal as codes changes need to be supplied as patches and I cannot quickly see any patches in the txt file.
If there are manual changes then these are in separate SVN directory on Sourceforge that patches should be supplied for.
If ther are wiki pages then see if you can update/add pages.
Overall IMHO 2c worth of feedback is that for ANY open source project you would like to contribute to you need to fit in with the way the project works in order to get changes included otherwise your changes will end up in the bit bucket.