The 09 February 2026 build (13785) is out.

[Xaviou]

Hi

Hi, Xaviou, I'm not sure why the "at" is preferred instead of "[]"?

Well, I don't either really know  It's a solution given by chatgpt to solve this building problem:

ArrayChecks is a wxArrayBool, and with GCC 15, the non-const [] operator of wxBaseArray<bool> breaks (bool& is impossible with vector<bool>)

We have some discussion here: New wxWidgets releases

I apologize : I had this solution just after rev13802 (solving the first building problem).
I updated to rev 13810 before creating the patch, and tested the build, but only with the patch, not without.

Now that I have tested the rev 13810 "as is", I can confirm it works without the watch.
Again, sorry.

Regards.
Xav'

[ollydbg]

Hi Xaviou, never mind. I really appreciate all your contributions to wxWidgets and Code::Blocks.