Hi
Hi, Xaviou, I'm not sure why the "at" is preferred instead of "[]"?
Well, I don't either really know
It's a solution given by chatgpt to solve this building problem:
ArrayChecks is a wxArrayBool, and with GCC 15, the non-const [] operator of wxBaseArray<bool> breaks (bool& is impossible with vector<bool>)
We have some discussion here: New wxWidgets releases
I apologize : I had this solution just after rev13802 (solving the first building problem).
I updated to rev 13810 before creating the patch, and tested the build, but only with the patch, not without.
Now that I have tested the rev 13810 "as is", I can confirm it works without the watch.
Again, sorry.
Regards.
Xav'
