Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
exchndl related patch because win32/lib folder is empty in SVN
stahta01:
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on September 07, 2015, 09:04:44 pm ---Also do we need to have such complex file structure in the libs folder?
Why don't you flatten or at least group libs by purpose - sdk and plugins for example.
--- End quote ---
I can flatten if you want me to; but, it seemed safer to keep them in separate folders.
Will the folders base, sdk, and plugins be OK with you?
The ones in the SDK folder should only be used to make the SDK and its supporting libs.
While base seems to be used by sdk, plugins, and tools.
So, I can tinyxml in plugins or I can have it in the base folder.
So, would you want a base folder or not?
Edit: Other option is just to keep the sdk folder and the rest in the lib folder without a sub-folder.
Too many plugins where using the SDK libs my mistake for me to remove the SDK sub-folder.
Tim S.
stahta01:
--- Quote from: stahta01 on September 07, 2015, 11:55:20 pm ---
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on September 07, 2015, 09:04:44 pm ---Also do we need to have such complex file structure in the libs folder?
Why don't you flatten or at least group libs by purpose - sdk and plugins for example.
--- End quote ---
I can flatten if you want me to; but, it seemed safer to keep them in separate folders.
Will the folders base, sdk, and plugins be OK with you?
The ones in the SDK folder should only be used to make the SDK and its supporting libs.
While base seems to be used by sdk, plugins, and tools.
So, I can tinyxml in plugins or I can have it in the base folder.
So, would you want a base folder or not?
Edit: Other option is just to keep the sdk folder and the rest in the lib folder without a sub-folder.
Too many plugins where using the SDK libs my mistake for me to remove the SDK sub-folder.
Tim S.
--- End quote ---
I have decided to finish testing the patches for windows one last time on Windows 64 bit.
And, then to change the lib layout to use the SDK sub-folder only. And, to start testing my patches that way.
I will also likely add back the libname suffix (of 30/64) at the same time.
Will likely take a while for me to do these changes.
Tim S.
oBFusCATed:
If I were you I'd either do one of
1. sdk (where all libs needed by plugins are placed) and plugins (where libs needed by some plugins are placed).
2. place all libs in a single folder
stahta01:
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on September 08, 2015, 12:05:13 am ---If I were you I'd either do one of
1. sdk (where all libs needed by plugins are placed) and plugins (where libs needed by some plugins are placed).
2. place all libs in a single folder
--- End quote ---
How to keep the plugins from linking to libs that they should NOT link to in that layout?
There was one or more plugins linking or depending on wxscintilla_cb in my patch that was found because of the sub-folder SDK that was needed only by the SDK.
Tim S.
oBFusCATed:
By inspecting the build log?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version