Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
exchndl related patch because win32/lib folder is empty in SVN
stahta01:
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on September 08, 2015, 12:20:42 am ---By inspecting the build log?
--- End quote ---
That a lot of work for very little gain.
I will let you all to continue to waste time that way if you wish.
Tim S.
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: stahta01 on September 07, 2015, 11:49:49 pm ---I thought being in separate folders would be enough; if you wish I can add the suffixes back.
Do you wish me to to that?
--- End quote ---
Oh - maybe I misunderstood the folder structure then. If they are in separate folders it would be fine... Maybe I should apply the interim patch and see myself. I just waited because you said there would be an update...
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: stahta01 on September 07, 2015, 11:55:20 pm ---
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on September 07, 2015, 09:04:44 pm ---Also do we need to have such complex file structure in the libs folder?
Why don't you flatten or at least group libs by purpose - sdk and plugins for example.
--- End quote ---
I can flatten if you want me to; but, it seemed safer to keep them in separate folders.
--- End quote ---
I don't know if complete flattening is good. Third party libs may be needed in different versions (as the bzip lib, for example). So if the folders are "too flat" you would probably overwrite a library with a wrong version which is bad. Every target (being plugin or SDK) should have an own folder to cope with such.
stahta01:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on September 08, 2015, 08:22:29 am ---
--- Quote from: stahta01 on September 07, 2015, 11:49:49 pm ---I thought being in separate folders would be enough; if you wish I can add the suffixes back.
Do you wish me to to that?
--- End quote ---
Oh - maybe I misunderstood the folder structure then. If they are in separate folders it would be fine... Maybe I should apply the interim patch and see myself. I just waited because you said there would be an update...
--- End quote ---
OK, I will remove the 30/64 once more.
Tim S.
stahta01:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on September 08, 2015, 08:25:15 am ---
--- Quote from: stahta01 on September 07, 2015, 11:55:20 pm ---
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on September 07, 2015, 09:04:44 pm ---Also do we need to have such complex file structure in the libs folder?
Why don't you flatten or at least group libs by purpose - sdk and plugins for example.
--- End quote ---
I can flatten if you want me to; but, it seemed safer to keep them in separate folders.
--- End quote ---
I don't know if complete flattening is good. Third party libs may be needed in different versions (as the bzip lib, for example). So if the folders are "too flat" you would probably overwrite a library with a wrong version which is bad. Every target (being plugin or SDK) should have an own folder to cope with such.
--- End quote ---
I will add back the contrib folders; but, NOT the sdk and base folders.
Tim S.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version