Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

exchndl related patch because win32/lib folder is empty in SVN

<< < (11/15) > >>

ollydbg:

--- Quote from: stahta01 on September 07, 2015, 02:00:48 pm ---Found that my add lib patches was NOT needed to remove the warning and likely not needed to remove the build error.

I needed to move "exchndl/win32/lib" before "devel" in the linker search and deleted the src target pre-build step file deletion.
And, my warning went away.

Tim S.

--- End quote ---
I already states this idea, see: Re: exchndl related patch because win32/lib folder is empty in SVN, but no one response to my idea.  :(

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: stahta01 on September 07, 2015, 02:04:41 pm ---I added folders for the static libs and removed lib name suffixes of 30, 64, or 30_64.

--- End quote ---
Why did you remove the post-fixes? They are required as wx30 cannot be mixed with wx28 libs and 32 bits cannot be mixed with 64 bits...?!

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: ollydbg on September 07, 2015, 03:16:19 pm ---I already states this idea, see: Re: exchndl related patch because win32/lib folder is empty in SVN, but no one response to my idea.  :(

--- End quote ---
You could have done this directly... ;-)

oBFusCATed:
Also do we need to have such complex file structure in the libs folder?
Why don't you flatten or at least group libs by purpose - sdk and plugins for example.

stahta01:

--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on September 07, 2015, 03:56:02 pm ---
--- Quote from: stahta01 on September 07, 2015, 02:04:41 pm ---I added folders for the static libs and removed lib name suffixes of 30, 64, or 30_64.

--- End quote ---
Why did you remove the post-fixes? They are required as wx30 cannot be mixed with wx28 libs and 32 bits cannot be mixed with 64 bits...?!

--- End quote ---

I thought being in separate folders would be enough; if you wish I can add the suffixes back.
Do you wish me to to that?

Tim S.
 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page