Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Plugins development
MiniDoc
oBFusCATed:
If you're talking about this: https://github.com/danselmi/MiniDoc/network then Jens' fork is way older and doesn't contain lots of commits. But probably it could be easily rebased.
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on February 21, 2015, 09:17:43 pm ---If you're talking about this: https://github.com/danselmi/MiniDoc/network then Jens' fork is way older and doesn't contain lots of commits. But probably it could be easily rebased.
--- End quote ---
Ah - I didn't check the history. I was under the assumption that a fork must always be newer... :P ::)
OK, but still: any comments on the performance? Am I the only one experiencing such?
Jenna:
My intention when forking the repo was to make a pull request, which can be integrated automatically into the original repo without the need to handle patches manually.
It's not a "normal" fork.
oBFusCATed:
I've not used it since the first try, because it had problems when using two editors side by side.
Also I think it should not land in trunk before next release.
danselmi:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on February 21, 2015, 09:49:16 pm ---...
OK, but still: any comments on the performance? Am I the only one experiencing such?
--- End quote ---
It is/was really bad. But I just commited some improvements. It still needs some resources but.. test it yourself.
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on February 21, 2015, 11:22:50 pm ---I've not used it since the first try, because it had problems when using two editors side by side.
--- End quote ---
What problems?
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on February 21, 2015, 11:22:50 pm ---Also I think it should not land in trunk before next release.
--- End quote ---
Reasons? I am not in hurry. But I can't take anything out of statements like this!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version