If wxCrafter was fully FOSS-ed would be more than convenient for many
How is wxCrafter related here? its a tool, similar to VC compiler, Intel compiler or even Windows Explorer all of are not open source tools... and yet CodeBlocks allows access to them...
I simply created a plugin to allows CodeBlocks to interact with yet another tool (let call it wxCrafter) in a smoother way, you can choose to use it or to ignore it.
The plugin itself (again, _not_ wxCrafter) is open source, what Morten suggested was to add the plugin sources to the SVN
Does not this affects Code::Blocks's concept or are there any plans to move plugin to a more "permissive" license
I really don't understand this statement. The plugin is opened source. wxCrafter is not. Don't mix between the two
Eran