Preparing Code::Blocks Release

[killerbot]

could you update your svn  (rev 6216) and try again

[Phenom]

Well, is it still long till the new release?

[keenblade]

could you update your svn  (rev 6216) and try again

killerbot, many thanks for the fix. C::B compiles fine with svn  (rev 6216).

[Folco]

Where can be found an up-to-date changelog of C::B ? I currently use svn 6206, I don't want to recompile if there is no changes which could interest me.

Thanks in advance.

[Jenna]

Where can be found an up-to-date changelog of C::B ? I currently use svn 6206, I don't want to recompile if there is no changes which could interest me.

Thanks in advance.

See my signature.

[eweb2009]

very curious if bugs such as resizing "build option" is fixed or not yet in this version.

Dear community,

on behalf of the whole code::Blocks team I would like to inform you hereby that we are in the preparation phase for a new release of Code::Blocks. Most important: WE NEED YOUR HELP!

The road map is as follows:
- the latest nightly (see http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,12098.0.html) shall be the base revision
- from that nightly on we are on FEATURE FREEZE that means: don't expect / ask for new features, we won't commit such
- we expect bug reports, posted in an own thread in this forum: http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/board,7.0.html
- we will address critical patches with that release in SVN trunk
- if needed another nightly will be announced (you can call it release candidate if you like)
- a release branch will be created
- release will be done.

Here is what you can do:
- use the nightly proposed (or compile from trunk), report bugs!!!
- check the bug tracker of C::B for bugs still active that may be show stoppers
- if you are a developer: try to find patches for the bugs reported

Here is what you shouldn't do:
- ask for new features
- ask for a more detailed schedule

FINALLY: In addition I would hereby open a LOGO / SPLASH SCREEN CONTEST!
The rules are simple:
- setup a logo (probably based on the current one)
- post this logo in this forum: http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/board,7.0.html
- it must have our logo (as seen on http://www.codeblocks.org)
- the word "Code::Blocks" shall be part of the logo, including the "::"
- the word "Code::Blocks" should not be splitted
- there must be space for the release number (most likely 10/04)
- there must be space for the revision number
- it must "work" nicely under all platforms (important if you are using alpha / transparency)
- don't overdo it, we still strike for simplicity
- finally: discuss the logos, we will setup an open poll after a while to decide which one we will pick.

GO AHEAD! HELP US TODAY!

Edit: Added additional specification for the logo / splash screen contest

[Folco]

Where can be found an up-to-date changelog of C::B ? I currently use svn 6206, I don't want to recompile if there is no changes which could interest me.

Thanks in advance.

See my signature.

Indeed, but the changelog seems to have been refreshed until revision 6203, but not after this one. ^^

[Jenna]

Where can be found an up-to-date changelog of C::B ? I currently use svn 6206, I don't want to recompile if there is no changes which could interest me.

Thanks in advance.

See my signature.

Indeed, but the changelog seems to have been refreshed until revision 6203, but not after this one. ^^

It's at actual revision.
Missing revision-numbers are commits in other branches than trunk.

[Folco]

Ok, thank you.

[kencamargo]

very curious if bugs such as resizing "build option" is fixed or not yet in this version.

Reposting an entire post from way back just to ask yet again a question that was replied elsewhere (that it apparently is an irreproducible bug) does not add much to the effort.

Just my 2 cents.

Ken

[198710]

Why still not released?
Is the release dead?

[MortenMacFly]

Why still not released?
Is the release dead?

Check the log and don't spam the forums with such nonsense posts. Thank you.

[198710]

I ask the question because someone said the release version in the logo is probably 10.04,but it's almost the end of May,OK? 

[nanyu]

I ask the question because someone said the release version in the logo is probably 10.04,but it's almost the end of May,OK? 

We all want to release it quickly, but this is a difficult task. Please do not be too worried。

[nanyu]

In the face of those blocks can not have some decoration? For example: print some light gray c + + code.