Author Topic: more than one tool simultaneously  (Read 5042 times)

Offline Joerg

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 100
more than one tool simultaneously
« on: July 09, 2007, 11:38:15 am »
Hi,

I would like to run more than one tool concurrent from the Tools menu.
E.g. In my case a TFTP server and a telnet client for my embedded device.
I configured both with:
Launch tool visible (without output redirection)
When I want to start the second one, I get the error:
Another tool is currently executing..

They just need to be started, there is no need for redirection or
connection with C::B.

Regards,
Joerg

It's never too late to fail!

Offline Biplab

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
    • Biplab's Blog
Re: more than one tool simultaneously
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2007, 11:42:33 am »
They just need to be started, there is no need for redirection or
connection with C::B.

Why don't you launch them from Explorer? If they have no connection with C::B, then is it necessary to start them off C::B?
Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

Offline MortenMacFly

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 9723
Re: more than one tool simultaneously
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2007, 12:08:22 pm »
Another tool is currently executing..
Use the last option "Launch tool visible detached (without output redirection)" and it'll work.
Compiler logging: Settings->Compiler & Debugger->tab "Other"->Compiler logging="Full command line"
C::B Manual: https://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html
C::B FAQ: https://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ

Offline Joerg

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 100
Re: more than one tool simultaneously
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2007, 10:16:03 am »
Why don't you launch them from Explorer? If they have no connection with C::B, then is it necessary to start them off C::B?

Just for convenience! I need these tools when programming on the project.
Next will be a JTAG gdb server for debugging.

Use the last option "Launch tool visible detached (without output redirection)" and it'll work.

Yes thanks, that works.
I already tried but only changed the last one.  :?

It's never too late to fail!