The 12 August 2007 build will NOT be out.

[killerbot]

no commits

[boulabiar]

Please !
I want to know when there will be a version 1.0 !!
It's not understandable that after 2 years we still use nightly builds ?!

We can stop adding new features and try to do our best to release at least a 1.0 version, then we return to nightly builds if you want.

I tried to speak with some Linux distributions people to put C::B in their DVD Releases and they told me they can't put nightly builds !

Or can anyone tell me why there is no official release ?

Thanks

[Mad Scientist]

Just a thought but if nightly builds cant be done maybe an official monthly/quarterly build take from what is felt to be a stable nightly build given a version number and placed on the download page. While still a release candidate it would provide up to date and stable builds for the distros yet not be to often to keep up with. My two cents.

[sgt_pinky]

The only difference between a 'version 1.0' and a nightly build is the name.

[imbaczek]

since quite some time codeblocks has had a pretty irritating habit of restoring it's focus when I click something else on the taskbar. also, code definition tooltips appear when the window is not active, and sometimes they won't disappear.

[dje]

Hi !

since quite some time codeblocks has had a pretty irritating habit of restoring it's focus when I click something else on the taskbar

I noticed this too.
When it happens, Code::Blocks restores the focus exactly twice (you need to click three times on the taskbar to use the other app).

Dje

[boulabiar]

>>The only difference between a 'version 1.0' and a nightly build is the name.

So why you don't change the name
Also, why you don't change the link of these bad old 1.0Rc2 in your site ?