wxScintilla 1.69.2 running with SVN head

[Pecan]

I just wondered if it really bears a significant advantage for us.

There were quite several unicode changes during the time of our last wxScintilla update. Meanwhile wxScintilla is released as "unicode stable"... for whatever that means...?! Which reminds me: I should try the unicode issue killerbot reported in another thread with this version of C::B of mine... I'll do so - if that works this would definetely be a reason to commit.
With regards, Morten.

To mention a caution here:

There is a serious bug with scintilla and gtk. Remember the double-click on marked-area hangs?

I can't determine if they fixed this. I submitted the patch that we use in CodeBlocks,  but could never determine if they used it.

So I opine that some serious testing needs to be done before using new scintilla code.

[MortenMacFly]

I can't determine if they fixed this.

Good point! Where can I find the patch? Is it in the S::F bugtracker somewhere?

Edit: And by the way: I'm not in a hurry submitting this - it is completely untested (so far) under linux because I hadn't have time to compile. Before this I won't do anything anyway... I'm aware that this is a core component. Again: This is an informal message in the first place.

[killerbot]

I just wondered if it really bears a significant advantage for us.

There were quite several unicode changes during the time of our last wxScintilla update. Meanwhile wxScintilla is released as "unicode stable"... for whatever that means...?! Which reminds me: I should try the unicode issue killerbot reported in another thread with this version of C::B of mine... I'll do so - if that works this would definetely be a reason to commit.
With regards, Morten.

I will try it to, for the uncomment issue

[Pecan]

I can't determine if they fixed this.

Good point! Where can I find the patch? Is it in the S::F bugtracker somewhere?

Edit: And by the way: I'm not in a hurry submitting this - it is completely untested (so far) under linux because I hadn't have time to compile. Before this I won't do anything anyway... I'm aware that this is a core component. Again: This is an informal message in the first place.

I submitted the patch to wxScintilla group.
It's still sitting at:

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=141621&atid=753190


This is the patch we use to semi-avoid the gtk/wxScintilla hang.

http://developer.berlios.de/patch/index.php?func=detailpatch&patch_id=1037&group_id=5358


That berlios patch search mechanism is a pita. If you search for any/any/any patch, you can't find the accepted patches. Wierd.

[MortenMacFly]

I can't determine if they fixed this.

They did not. I've applied it within my local copy of 1.69.2... just to make sure. Thanks.