Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
C::B with DM or vc++?
takeshimiya:
It's here: http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php?topic=2085.0
C::B has been compiled with MSVC and Intel compilers with few one-time changes.
killerbot:
My personal opinion :
- OFFICIAL CB is compiled with GCC and reamins that way ( see remarks of Yiannis)
- let's try to help the people who try to build CB with other compilers (other mostly true warnings/ errors) --> always good to compile with everal compilers
- if people see a more 'optimized' build of CB can be obtained by using another compiler they can build it themselves (they just get the sources and make it themselves), choice is a good thing, but maintaining CB distributions with different compilers is a bit to much for the CB team, but every user can then however create on his/her self.
Note don't focus too much on the build time of CB itself only ( I rather compile it with a slow compiler to have in the end a fast CB application, then have it compile super quick and ending up with a slow CB)
Good luck with this further research, very interesting !!!
Cheers,
Lieven
Trikko:
--- Quote from: Michael on February 23, 2006, 05:05:57 pm ---
Anyway, have a look at here.
--- End quote ---
DM passes 100% of dr. dobbs tests :D
http://www.digitalmars.com/changelog.html#new845
ehehhehe :)
Trikko:
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on February 23, 2006, 05:13:44 pm ---It's here: http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php?topic=2085.0
C::B has been compiled with MSVC and Intel compilers with few one-time changes.
--- End quote ---
Why didn't C::B developer apply this patches to official distro?
takeshimiya:
--- Quote from: Trikko on February 23, 2006, 05:21:20 pm ---Why didn't C::B developer apply this patches to official distro?
--- End quote ---
I think Sam didn't posted the patches on the tracker. :)
I agree with Lieven here.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version