Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
C::B with DM or vc++?
thomas:
--- Quote from: NeXuS on February 23, 2006, 01:36:53 pm ---This is just my two euro cents of wisdom.
--- End quote ---
And it's perfectly true :)
Trikko:
http://www.osnews.com/img/5602/results.jpg <-- watch this benchmark about math
http://biolpc22.york.ac.uk/wx/wxhatch/wxMSW_Compiler_choice.html <-- a quite old test with wxwidgets
There are many other example. You can try it by yourself... Where can i find an unofficial vc or dm build of C::B? :)
takeshimiya:
--- Quote from: Trikko on February 23, 2006, 04:48:33 pm ---http://biolpc22.york.ac.uk/wx/wxhatch/wxMSW_Compiler_choice.html <-- a quite old test with wxwidgets
--- End quote ---
I have to say that those wxWidgets benchmarks are true, I've tested myself, and DMars is 20x times faster than GCC3 in compilation time. YMMV.
As a note, DMars linker is purely written in assembler, and the compiler got lot's of parts also.
It would be good to benchmark GCC4 too, as for sure it comes closer with the new AST optimizations.
--- Quote from: Trikko on February 23, 2006, 04:48:33 pm ---There are many other example. You can try it by yourself... Where can i find an unofficial vc or dm build of C::B? :)
--- End quote ---
Ask Sam, as I've said above, he got it compiling :D
Michael:
--- Quote from: Trikko on February 23, 2006, 04:48:33 pm ---http://www.osnews.com/img/5602/results.jpg <-- watch this benchmark about math
http://biolpc22.york.ac.uk/wx/wxhatch/wxMSW_Compiler_choice.html <-- a quite old test with wxwidgets
--- End quote ---
The GCC used is old. Now we are quite (or already) at GCC 4.1.0. The benchmarks should be re-done :D.
Anyway, have a look at here.
--- Quote from: Trikko on February 23, 2006, 04:48:33 pm ---There are many other example. You can try it by yourself... Where can i find an unofficial vc or dm build of C::B? :)
--- End quote ---
I am not sure that such unofficial builds of C::B exists. May be as Takeshi Miya said, Sam has done one. You can always try to build SVN sources by yourself and share your results :).
Best wishes,
Michael
Trikko:
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on February 23, 2006, 04:59:42 pm ---
Ask Sam, as I've said above, he got it compiling :D
--- End quote ---
Where is he? Give me his homepage! :D
Source from svn does not compile with other compilers... they need a patch... It could be useful to compile it with more compilers: in this way code become more "portable" :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version