Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > CodeCompletion redesign

Patch 3407: correctly parse c++98 enums

<< < (3/5) > >>

killerbot:
YES : this updated patch seems to work correctly    ;D

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on January 21, 2013, 10:24:50 pm ---p2rkw: Can you try to add some tests? See Morten's comment.

--- End quote ---
I've done it. Please test against them:
https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/codeblocks/trunk/src/plugins/codecompletion/testing/structs_typedefs_enums.cbp
...respectively:
https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/codeblocks/trunk/src/plugins/codecompletion/testing/structs_typedefs_enums.cpp

Martin K.:
Hi,

whats about typedef union and unnamed members? It seems that something like this:

typedef union
{
    unsigned short Value;

    struct
    {
        unsigned short Var1:6;
        unsigned short Var2:10;
    };
}
SOME_ID, *PSOME_ID;

could not be found.

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: Martin K. on January 22, 2013, 11:01:54 am ---whats about typedef union and unnamed members? It seems that something like this:

--- End quote ---
...added another test case to SVN (and fixed some warnings).

ollydbg:

--- Quote from: Martin K. on January 22, 2013, 11:01:54 am ---Hi,

whats about typedef union and unnamed members? It seems that something like this:

typedef union
{
    unsigned short Value;

    struct
    {
        unsigned short Var1:6;
        unsigned short Var2:10;
    };
}
SOME_ID, *PSOME_ID;

could not be found.


--- End quote ---
I think this bug should be discussed in another thread :), and let's focus on handling emun declaration in this thread.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page