User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)
New CMake generator using Code::Blocks' internal build system
Benjamin Eikel:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on September 23, 2012, 05:02:09 pm ---OK - but this sounds like an IDE is required to have a non-UI build process to make it into Cmake?! That would be new to me. I understand having a non-UI build its a "nice to have" thing, but it shouldn't be a requirement. I think there are plenty of IDE's around that do not support that. How do you handle the very common and famous Eclipse IDE for example? (I know Cmake supports it, too.) And was it really different at the time you did the C::B Makefile based generator?
--- End quote ---
The old C::B Makefile generator as well as the Eclipse generator use the Makefiles to do the build. Therefore, you can call "make" instead of using the IDE. The generated project files are more or less an extra on top of the Makefile. Because I want to get rid of the Makefile, I cannot use this approach.
Jenna:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on September 23, 2012, 05:02:09 pm ---[...]
the mentioned branch should be just fine (maybe Jens can do another merge before)
[...]
--- End quote ---
I will see what I can do.
Merging is not as easy as it would like it to be (too many other merges [debugger-branch and trunk]).
Jenna:
--- Quote from: jens on September 23, 2012, 06:40:40 pm ---
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on September 23, 2012, 05:02:09 pm ---[...]
the mentioned branch should be just fine (maybe Jens can do another merge before)
[...]
--- End quote ---
I will see what I can do.
Merging is not as easy as it would like it to be (too many other merges [debugger-branch and trunk]).
--- End quote ---
Merging the branches was imposiible, nuch too much merge conflicts.
I created a new (local) branch and recreated the console-branch which is now (at the moment) a real child of trunk (might break again if xml-branch is merged).
I will try to do the merges more often, so it will not divert as much as it was.
@MortenMacFly and other devs:
should I create a complete new branch on the server (e.g. cb_headless) or should I delete the old one and recreate it (with the same name) from my new local branch ?
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: jens on September 24, 2012, 03:42:41 pm ---should I delete the old one and recreate it (with the same name) from my new local branch ?
--- End quote ---
Go for that, even deleted branches are still accessible afterwards.
Jenna:
The recreated console-branch should work with wx2.8 and wx2.9, using project-files or automake-system.
The changes are (as before) linux only.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version