Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Compiler Framework Redesign
XML based compilers
Alpha:
Do not worry, I am not trying to argue you change your mind ;). In my reading, I had bumped into the following, and thought I would post some links in case the topic of plural translations was ever revisited in the future.
* wxPLURAL()
* wxTranslations::GetString()
* gettext - plural forms
* gettext - translating plural forms
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: Alpha on November 20, 2012, 12:42:16 am ---Do not worry, I am not trying to argue you change your mind ;). In my reading, I had bumped into the following, and thought I would post some links in case the topic of plural translations was ever revisited in the future.
* wxPLURAL()
* wxTranslations::GetString()
* gettext - plural forms
* gettext - translating plural forms
--- End quote ---
I know about these, but they all cause to double the units to translate in the worst case. The question is: In an IDE - is "dependency/ies" enough, or do you really want to be that super correct. I mean its not a scientific thesis we are doing here. And (most important to me) we don't want to scare away translators.
oBFusCATed:
Morten: Can you show us if you can do a pain free svn merge?
Alpha:
I have some changes in my local copy; would you prefer to have them now (some changes are not yet thoroughly tested), or after the merge (assuming it will be soon)?
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: Alpha on December 10, 2012, 02:50:30 am ---I have some changes in my local copy; would you prefer to have them now (some changes are not yet thoroughly tested), or after the merge (assuming it will be soon)?
--- End quote ---
After.
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on December 10, 2012, 12:51:58 am ---Morten: Can you show us if you can do a pain free svn merge?
--- End quote ---
Sorry, no time atm, but I'll see what I can do later this or next week.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version