Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Compiler Framework Redesign
XML based compilers
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on October 06, 2012, 11:46:44 pm ---The hack is already in svn...
--- End quote ---
...the description now, too.
I was able to reproduce it with one of my own projects, too btw. But I could swear this came with more recent version of either Ubuntu or wxWidgets. I've never seen such before. So it would either be a wxWidgets or Ubuntu thing. I wonder how a more recent wx294 demo case would behave.
killerbot:
I would refactor this in a little method which name says it is a hack, since now (just looking at the diff), there is code duplication, and will be easier to remove (function calls and implementation), and easier to test if hack is still needed (temporarily make the function empty)
What do you think ?
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: killerbot on October 07, 2012, 10:40:36 am ---What do you think ?
--- End quote ---
Why not? I though in this case, as both hacks are directly after each other it would not be needed. Because if you see the one hack you'll also see the other.
Alpha:
--- Quote from: killerbot on October 06, 2012, 11:09:41 pm ---good idea to file it to ubuntu
--- End quote ---
Bug reported.
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: Alpha on October 08, 2012, 11:40:02 pm ---
--- Quote from: killerbot on October 06, 2012, 11:09:41 pm ---good idea to file it to ubuntu
--- End quote ---
Bug reported.
--- End quote ---
Wouldn't the wxWidgets bug-tracker be the right place to report?!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version