Author Topic: suggest setter/getter refactoring  (Read 8977 times)

Offline drev

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
suggest setter/getter refactoring
« on: October 15, 2007, 07:53:27 pm »
Hi, I downloaded last year C::B, and lately go the the svn to donwload a newer version, I am very impressed of all the work done !

the setter and getters feature is missing thus... (like in eclipse)

Offline XayC

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 94
Re: suggest setter/getter refactoring
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2007, 08:49:01 pm »
The Java version of Ecplise has a very powerful set of integrated tools to help writing, and maintaining code. Currently Code::Blocks has nothing comparable with that, still it has a C++ Code Completion plug-in that works (even if it has some problems and features to add).

You can browse the forums and you'll find a lot of information on the current weaknesses of the CC, as well as the redesign project. If you want you can try to add that feature (it would be really nice), but I would not expect it to be implemented soon.

Regards, XayC

Shaidak

  • Guest
Re: suggest setter/getter refactoring
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2009, 04:52:16 pm »
Hi,

I'm currently working on it and I want to be sure no one else have already started the job  8)
I don't know how much time it'll take me to fully develop it (it's an attributes manager more than just a getters/setters manager) but I think it'll be ready this summer (cause I'm not used anymore to wxWidgets, I use to work on Qt since its 4.5 version has been released), so if someone is already on it, it would be nice to tell it  :D

Offline dje590

  • Single posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: suggest setter/getter refactoring
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2010, 05:44:42 pm »
Hello,

I would like to know if there's a codeblocks pulgin that create getters/setters at this day.

thanks a lot

Offline bioinfornatics

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: suggest setter/getter refactoring
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2010, 01:01:52 am »
same