Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
Splitting debugger in two - specific debugger and common GUI
oBFusCATed:
Execute src/update or src/update.bat depending on your OS...
xhpohanka:
Hello, work on the debugger GUI is promising, but I'd like to ask you - is there a possibility to simply delete or rename a watched variable? I mean by pressing del, or f2 to rename or something similar, not only using context menu. Also I'm lacking the possibility of changing the format (decimal, hex, unsigned, ...) for member variables in expanded structure or class.
Nevertheless the new GUI works really well... Thank you.
oBFusCATed:
Yes, use linux :lol: (the buttons are delete and insert)
Something is happening on windows and the shortcuts doesn't work.
I've to investigate why. It is on the TODO list.
oBFusCATed:
dmoore:
Do you think to work on your debugger plugin soon?
I've tried it bug it failed to compile. I've fixed the compilation (I can provide the patch if you're interested),
but it crashed C::B (should fix the API a bit, but this will be done later), because the new configuration staff is missing.
p.s. have you though of using wxSmith for the GUI? If you use wxSmith it will be easier for others to modify your GUIs, and contribute:)
cbexaminr:
(items quoted were posted almost 3 months ago back on page 28 of thread)
1of3)Morten, regarding
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on February 08, 2011, 08:30:05 pm ---However, as a compromise how about applying it for a nightly to give a chance to other users to try. If the community benefits from it we can polish out the ToDo's. But this should clearly be done in a continuous work.
--- End quote ---
My patch does not appear to have been applied to any nightly. Oversight on my part, or current plans concerning this?
2of3)oBFusCATed , regarding
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on February 08, 2011, 03:19:06 pm ---This one requires major refactoring. If it doesn't bother you, use your version for now. I'll give it a try myself next week, I think I'll have a bit of free time.
--- End quote ---
Any progress I've overlooked on this refactoring, or if not, a timeline yet when this might be sufficiently complete to host my previously submitted functionality in a form acceptable to you?
3of3)oBFusCATed /Others, the crash possible in Attach to process previously introduced with earlier cdb support related patches does not seem to have been corrected (outside of the not yet accepted/applied patch [with other functionality] I previously submitted.)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version