Author Topic: Code::Blocks lite?  (Read 5772 times)

Offline rogerh

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Code::Blocks lite?
« on: July 28, 2015, 11:02:17 pm »
I find CB to be massive overkill for what I'm doing.

I just need to compile a program with a few common blocks and access to an external graphics package. My main need is speed because I'm processing very large files.

Is there a smaller version of CB better suited to this?

Roger

Offline BlueHazzard

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3353
Re: Code::Blocks lite?
« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2015, 11:03:37 pm »
notepad and cmd with gcc?

Offline rogerh

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Code::Blocks lite?
« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2015, 11:08:21 pm »
No, I want the IDE features to handle the mechanics, flagging error, liinking, etc so I can concentrate on the programming part.

Roger

Offline oBFusCATed

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 13413
    • Travis build status
Re: Code::Blocks lite?
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2015, 11:15:08 pm »
What do you mean by large files?
C::B can handle 10-20kloc files do you have bigger source files?
(most of the time I ignore long posts)
[strangers don't send me private messages, I'll ignore them; post a topic in the forum, but first read the rules!]

Offline rogerh

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Code::Blocks lite?
« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2015, 11:25:12 pm »
No, I mean data files. Things like the entire NEIC quake catalog or a 2000 year ephemeris.

Speed counts.

Roger

Offline BlueHazzard

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3353
Re: Code::Blocks lite?
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2015, 11:27:52 pm »
No, I want the IDE features to handle the mechanics, flagging error, liinking, etc so I can concentrate on the programming part.

Roger

Can you en light us where you think that c::b is to heavy? I have removed half of the plugins i don't need  like the nassi plugin, xp look and fell etc..., and c::b starts fast like notepad++...
If you are processing large files and c::b is slow with them you can try to disable code completition...

but unless you don't say us what your problem is we can't help you...

[EDIT:]
No, I mean data files. Things like the entire NEIC quake catalog or a 2000 year ephemeris.

Speed counts.

Roger

where counts speed? on compile time?

Offline rogerh

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Code::Blocks lite?
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2015, 11:36:33 pm »
CB has a hundred options where I need maybe 5 or 6.

I get lost in the jungle, trying to find what I need, especially when  the docs are so minimal.

CB isn't slow, it's just more than I need. Fortran is doing the work and it's plenty fast. It does in minutes what Perl would take days.

I'm not complaining and it isn't that much of a problem. I just wondered if there was a simpler version around.

Roger

Offline oBFusCATed

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 13413
    • Travis build status
Re: Code::Blocks lite?
« Reply #7 on: July 29, 2015, 12:07:38 am »
People here are not interested in a simpler version. They need full featured IDE.

For something simple probably you can try SciTe. It can build projects and you can type the code.
Vim is another simple example. SublimeText and probably many others.
But probably you won't find answers here, because people here use C::B and nothing else if possible  ;D
(most of the time I ignore long posts)
[strangers don't send me private messages, I'll ignore them; post a topic in the forum, but first read the rules!]