The 16 November 2013 build (9455) is out.

[Alpha]

I have tried this and apart from the old problem [...]

Did the setting resolve your old problem?

[...] a new issue appeared; it displays the same available keyword twice and still insists to concatenate the word right after colon.

My apologies, but I do not understand your description.  Could you try to explain it again?

[ToApolytoXaos]

Did the setting resolve your old problem?

Nope, I'm afraid I haven't.

My apologies, but I do not understand your description.  Could you try to explain it again?

I did what you have suggested (with Fill up characters) and now it duplicates the goto label twice in auto-completion popped up window while the old issue remains the same.

[killerbot]

"-Wno-unused-local-typedefs" , yes, ensure for sure that one can remain, cause this one is a warning exploder for wx, boost , ...

[ollydbg]

I see this error: (see screen shot below)


It happens when I open a simple wx2.8.12 project(from wx wizard), or press the build button.

Have any CB project in the past used two scripts in the Compiler other options before?

I think two does NOT work; I deleted either one and the error went away on the next project re-build.

Tim S.

Thank Tim, indeed, I see that the compiler options has such code:

Code

-pipe
-mthreads
[[if (PLATFORM == PLATFORM_MSW && (GetCompilerFactory().GetCompilerVersionString(_T("gcc")) >= _T("4.0.0"))) print(_T("-Wno-attributes"));]]
[[if (GetCompilerFactory().GetCompilerVersionString(_T("gcc")) >= _T("4.8.0")) print(_T("-Wno-unused-local-typedefs"));]]
-Winvalid-pch
-include wx_pch.h

@Alpha:
I don't know the reason we need "-Wno-attributes" options.
I do know that "-Wno-unused-local-typedefs" was used to remove build warnings.

[Alpha]

-Wno-attributes came from rev 4596:

Code

http://cb.biplab.in/websvn/log.php?repname=codeblocks&path=%2F&isdir=1&peg=9462&sr=4596&er=1&max=1&search=

I have removed -Wno-attributes from the wizard in trunk now, as -Wno-unused-local-typedefs looks to be currently a much more useful command.

[dmoore]

-Wno-attributes came from rev 4596:

Code

http://cb.biplab.in/websvn/log.php?repname=codeblocks&path=%2F&isdir=1&peg=9462&sr=4596&er=1&max=1&search=

I have removed -Wno-attributes from the wizard in trunk now, as -Wno-unused-local-typedefs looks to be currently a much more useful command.

Why don't we have check boxes for these -W flags in compiler settings?

[MortenMacFly]

Why don't we have check boxes for these -W flags in compiler settings?

Seems nobody configured it in the related XML compiler settings.

[Alpha]

Why don't we have check boxes for these -W flags in compiler settings?

Seems nobody configured it in the related XML compiler settings.

During the conversion to XML, I pretty much tried to do a straight copy of what existed.  My personal opinion is that there are already too many flags, and that uncommon/special case flags are better suited to be manually entered.
Do note that the GUI does support Right click->New flag, so if you want your local version to have more flags, it is as easy as that.

[MortenMacFly]

Do note that the GUI does support Right click->New flag, so if you want your local version to have more flags, it is as easy as that.

Sure thing, but as (at least) -Wno-unused-local-typedefs is relevant to wxWidgets it should be natively supported.

[ToApolytoXaos]

I went to Create a new project, right-click on GTK+ project, then Edit this script. The file opens in new tab window; I switch from Code::Blocks to Firefox using Alt+TAB, I come back to Code::Blocks and I get



Is this normal, or I hit a bug?

P.S.: Special thanks goes to @oBFusCATed for his reply to this request; if I have found a bug, he should get the credit for this

http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,18620.msg127477.html#msg127477

[oBFusCATed]

Is this normal, or I hit a bug?

Yes, I think it is normal, but I don't know if this is a good behaviour.

[ToApolytoXaos]

Currently compiled svn9468 on Windows 7 machine (at work) and auto-completion does not work properly.

As soon as I insert (*prd->st_info)->, instead of seeing the desired variables, I see whatever prd
has in it.

See the entire sample below:

Code: c

/*
 * Placed in Public Domain where applicable permitted by law.
 * USE IT AT YOUR OWN RISK!
 */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

#define nil ((void *)0)

typedef struct {
    int postal_code;
    const char *address;
} street_info_t;

typedef struct {
    street_info_t **st_info;
    const char *company_name;
} generic_t;

street_info_t * str_constructor(void) {
    street_info_t *tmp = (street_info_t *) malloc(sizeof(street_info_t));
    if (tmp == nil) {
        return nil;
    }
    return tmp;
}

void str_destructor(street_info_t **self) {
    if (*self != nil) {
        free(*self);
        *self = nil;
    }
    return;
}

generic_t * constructor(void) {
    generic_t *tmp = (generic_t *) malloc(sizeof(generic_t));
    if (tmp == nil) {
        return nil;
    }
    return tmp;
}

void destructor(generic_t **self) {
    if (*self != nil) {
        free(*self);
        *self = nil;
    }
    return;
}

int main(void)
{
    generic_t *prd = constructor();
    street_info_t *street = str_constructor();

    prd->st_info = &street;
    prd->company_name = "Disney Land";
    (*prd->st_info)->address = "Mikey Mouse avenue, Neverland";
    (*prd->st_info)->postal_code = 1010;

    printf("Company Name: %s\n", prd->company_name);
    printf("Address: %s\n", (*prd->st_info)->address);
    printf("Postal code: %d\n", (*prd->st_info)->postal_code);

    str_destructor(&street);
    prd->st_info = nil;

    destructor(&prd);

    return 0;
}

[oBFusCATed]

Is this a regression in this build?

[ollydbg]

@ToApolytoXaos, If I remember correctly, we don't handle the parentheses correctly in CC. (It need some kind of operator precedence parsing of the statement, but currently we don't have this feature)

[ToApolytoXaos]

Ah OK, no worries. So it's not a bug, but a lack of feature nice. Also, should not be logical to offer only C keywords if you use a project as C, unless it's used in C++ as extern C? Most of the times I get full list of unnecessary keyword tags.