Code::Blocks Forums
User forums => General (but related to Code::Blocks) => Topic started by: redliner on February 08, 2008, 09:02:27 am
-
Hello everyone!
How can i get Debug Perspective like in Eclipse CDT
screenshot of Eclipse
(http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/6786/screenshot2ox8.th.jpg) (http://img408.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshot2ox8.jpg)
after some actions i've got this, it is codeblocks
(http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/6660/screenshot1yd1.th.jpg) (http://img91.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshot1yd1.jpg)
but it's not very comfortable to debug there =((
-
but it's not very comfortable to debug there =((
??? It looks like the Eclipse one...?! I don't understand what you are trying to say - what's the problem exactly?
-
I want to get appearance like in Eclipse.
-
I want to get appearance like in Eclipse.
...according to your screenshots you have that already...?! If you mean "pixel-by-pixel wise" then sorry, Eclipse is Java UI, C::B is wxWidgets UI - these widget sets are different by design.
-
I guess he wants the single windows (watches, breakpoints ...) to be put into tabs as with Eclipse.
-
Also those Maximize Buttons on the Panes are Very Useful, but there is a bug when maximizing the bottom pane (as a top pane i think) with aui, it doesn't maximize completely on the window, only takes part of it. Some time ago i saw a patch to fix that on the aui forum.
-
I also prefer this kind of layout. A Debug notebook docked on the right would be nice. As I can only look at 1 window at a glance, I prefer a big one than 5 small.
Dje
-
Some time ago i saw a patch to fix that on the aui forum.
And it works.
BTW, the wxauinotebook already allows a wxauipane to be docked as a tab. The developers could drop wxflatnotebook and adopt wxauinotebook (the class' methods are the same).
-
2MortenMacFly Have you thought about this like a new feature?
-
The developers could drop wxflatnotebook and adopt wxauinotebook (the class' methods are the same).
2MortenMacFly Have you thought about this like a new feature?
I thinks it's not a bad idea, but it is in fact not as simple as a replacement. In addition we are changing a core component so this is a critical mission anyways. I don't see this to happen before the next C::B release.