Code::Blocks Forums

User forums => Nightly builds => Topic started by: killerbot on September 23, 2007, 07:44:17 pm

Title: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: killerbot on September 23, 2007, 07:44:17 pm
darn berlios ftp not working ......
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: Keyla on September 23, 2007, 08:29:46 pm
I don't trust me to ask but why don't we change the service e.g. sf.net ? Even if I support this german portal their availability is a  problem  :roll:
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: Seronis on September 23, 2007, 08:37:12 pm
This was brought up before (you can search for it), basically BOs started getting used (and sf dropped) because BOs had svn access at a time SF did not.  And the problems with BOs are fairly recent.  The devs had stated they are giving it a bit of time to see if the problems clear up.  Please be patient.
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: kkez on September 24, 2007, 12:15:31 am
sf.net doesn't have websvn, which is quite better than viewvc. ViewVc doesn't have any log so you can't keep track of the changes made, that can be useful to find the revision which may have broken your codeblocks compilation (for example). So, i'm for berlios.
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: stahta01 on September 24, 2007, 01:16:57 am
If I understand the sourceForge.net (sf.net) directions, you can use an SVN source not at sf.net, but still display it on sf.net. Note, I can not confirm this, but I thought it gave me the option when I setup my project up on sf.net

Can someone update sf.net so it points to berlios SVN?

Tim S
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: mandrav on September 24, 2007, 08:38:16 am
If I understand the sourceForge.net (sf.net) directions, you can use an SVN source not at sf.net, but still display it on sf.net. Note, I can not confirm this, but I thought it gave me the option when I setup my project up on sf.net

Can someone update sf.net so it points to berlios SVN?

Tim S

Thanks for bringing this up Tim.
SF.net page updated.
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: yop on September 24, 2007, 11:10:07 am
Berlios has added mantis (www.mantisbt.org) as an issue tracker option (http://developer.berlios.de/mantis/main_page.php) for each project. The difference is huge comparing with the existing bugtracking system. I hope they automagically move existing issues to the new bugtracker. Oh and mantis is my favorite issue tracker (along with trac which has a totally different flow though).
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: zsyddl on September 24, 2007, 01:36:25 pm
can I and how can I  get the latest source ?
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: Seronis on September 24, 2007, 02:16:00 pm
can I and how can I  get the latest source ?

http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Installing_Code::Blocks
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: JGM on September 24, 2007, 02:32:49 pm
Can someone update sf.net so it points to berlios SVN?

That would be great!
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: stahta01 on September 24, 2007, 03:29:47 pm
Patch for Windows without Pre-compiled Headers.

Tim S

Code
Index: src/sdk/cbproject.cpp
===================================================================
--- src/sdk/cbproject.cpp (revision 4486)
+++ src/sdk/cbproject.cpp (working copy)
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
     #include "globals.h"
     #include "pluginmanager.h"
     #include "projectmanager.h"
+    #include "macrosmanager.h"
     #include "messagemanager.h"
     #include "editormanager.h"
     #include "configmanager.h"
Index: src/plugins/compilergcc/advancedcompileroptionsdlg.cpp
===================================================================
--- src/plugins/compilergcc/advancedcompileroptionsdlg.cpp (revision 4486)
+++ src/plugins/compilergcc/advancedcompileroptionsdlg.cpp (working copy)
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <wx/listbox.h>
 #include <wx/spinctrl.h>
 #include <wx/textctrl.h>
+#include <wx/textdlg.h>
 #include <wx/xrc/xmlres.h>
 #include "compilerfactory.h"
 #include "globals.h"
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: Mad Scientist on September 24, 2007, 07:05:25 pm
If you have a project page and such on SF why don't you use them on cases like this when you can upload to berlios, and just put the update on SF? Is there any problem with using SF as a backup download host? ( it could also help when berlios has download problems too )
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: killerbot on September 24, 2007, 07:39:03 pm
done
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: Keyla on September 24, 2007, 08:52:21 pm
So I see that it wasn't just a 'random' decission and it brings a lot of advantages. No problem I can wait for the next nightly 8) I just wondered that there a so often problems on this service.
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: stahta01 on September 25, 2007, 02:32:22 am
So I see that it wasn't just a 'random' decission and it brings a lot of advantages. No problem I can wait for the next nightly 8) I just wondered that there a so often problems on this service.

For a while someone/group was doing an DDOS attack on Berlios; no idea if this is still the case.

Tim S
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: zsyddl on September 25, 2007, 03:22:08 am
can I and how can I  get the latest source ?

http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Installing_Code::Blocks

thank you ...
Title: Re: The 23 September 2007 build will NOT be out.
Post by: thomas on September 25, 2007, 11:29:52 am
For a while someone/group was doing an DDOS attack on Berlios; no idea if this is still the case.
Yes, that's one of the main problems, which caused a lot of out-times in the past. BerliOS has less resources and is thus more vulnerable to such things than other, bigger, services.

Now think about it, who would do such a thing... unless they're complete retards running haphazard attacks, it must be someone having a benefit from BerliOS not working and users being disgruntled.
To me that is even more reason to stay with BerliOS, as I'm not willing to affirm those people in what they do.