Can you help me here? Why didn't you just search for it before asking? Is the search hard to find? Is it hard to work with?Uhmm, why are you so angry? Is there any solution to this? I searched the forums and found nothing. However there are many posts reporting this particular problem.
I 'm just trying to understand why people never search these days...
Index: src/plugins/contrib/profiler/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- src/plugins/contrib/profiler/Makefile.am (revision 3139)
+++ src/plugins/contrib/profiler/Makefile.am (arbetskopia)
@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@
libdir = $(pkgdatadir)/plugins
-lib_LTLIBRARIES = libprofiler.la
+lib_LTLIBRARIES = libCBProfiler.la
-libprofiler_la_LDFLAGS = -module -version-info 0:1:0 -shared -no-undefined -avoid-version
+libCBProfiler_la_LDFLAGS = -module -version-info 0:1:0 -shared -no-undefined -avoid-version
-libprofiler_la_LIBADD = ../../../sdk/libcodeblocks.la
+libCBProfiler_la_LIBADD = ../../../sdk/libcodeblocks.la
-libprofiler_la_SOURCES = cbprofilerconfig.cpp \
+libCBProfiler_la_SOURCES = cbprofilerconfig.cpp \
cbprofiler.cpp \
cbprofilerexec.cpp
Index: src/plugins/contrib/profiler/resources/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- src/plugins/contrib/profiler/resources/Makefile.am (revision 3139)
+++ src/plugins/contrib/profiler/resources/Makefile.am (arbetskopia)
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
EXTRA_DIST = configuration.xrc main_dialog.xrc manifest.xml
-pkgdata_DATA = profiler.zip
+pkgdata_DATA = CBProfiler.zip
CLEANFILES = $(pkgdata_DATA)
-profiler.zip:
- PWD=`pwd` cd $(srcdir) && zip $(PWD)/profiler.zip manifest.xml *.xrc > /dev/null
+CBProfiler.zip:
+ PWD=`pwd` cd $(srcdir) && zip $(PWD)/CBProfiler.zip manifest.xml *.xrc > /dev/null
Index: src/plugins/contrib/profiler/cbprofiler.unix.cbp
===================================================================
--- src/plugins/contrib/profiler/cbprofiler.unix.cbp (revision 3139)
+++ src/plugins/contrib/profiler/cbprofiler.unix.cbp (arbetskopia)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
<Option virtualFolders="" />
<Build>
<Target title="default">
- <Option output="../../../devel/share/codeblocks/plugins/libcbprofiler.so" />
+ <Option output="../../../devel/share/codeblocks/plugins/libCBProfiler.so" />
<Option type="3" />
<Option compiler="gcc" />
</Target>
@@ -71,4 +71,4 @@
</Unit>
<Extensions />
</Project>
-</CodeBlocks_project_file>
\ Inget radslut vid filslut
+</CodeBlocks_project_file>
Index: src/tools/cb_share_config/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- src/tools/cb_share_config/Makefile.am (revision 3139)
+++ src/tools/cb_share_config/Makefile.am (arbetskopia)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
bin_PROGRAMS = cb_share_config
-INCLUDES = $(WX_CXXFLAGS)
+INCLUDES = $(WX_CXXFLAGS) -I$(top_srcdir)/src/sdk
cb_share_config_LDFLAGS =
The solution:Good, I'll update to head revision later today.
1) rename share/codeblocks/profiler.zip -> CBProfiler.zip
2) rename share/codeblocks/plugins/libprofiler.so -> libCBProfiler.so
3) rename share/codeblocks/plugins/libprofiler.la -> libCBProfiler.la
Or apply this patch and rebuild (you might have to run bootstrap again):
EDIT: Do a 'make uninstall' firstDo I always need to make uninstall? Isn't it sufficient to just make install when I compile the newer version? I thought the newer one will simply override previous one. Sorry for my ignorance. :oops:
Make install only overwrites and install new files. In this case you want to remove profiler.* that was wrong.
Do I always need to make uninstall? Isn't it sufficient to just make install when I compile the newer version? I thought the newer one will simply override previous one. Sorry for my ignorance. :oops:
Can you help me here? Why didn't you just search for it before asking? Is the search hard to find? Is it hard to work with?Uhmm, why are you so angry? Is there any solution to this? I searched the forums and found nothing. However there are many posts reporting this particular problem.
I 'm just trying to understand why people never search these days...
The solution:
1) rename share/codeblocks/profiler.zip -> CBProfiler.zip
2) rename share/codeblocks/plugins/libprofiler.so -> libCBProfiler.so
3) rename share/codeblocks/plugins/libprofiler.la -> libCBProfiler.la
Or apply this patch and rebuild (you might have to run bootstrap again):
EDIT: Do a 'make uninstall' firstCodeIndex: src/plugins/contrib/profiler/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- src/plugins/contrib/profiler/Makefile.am (revision 3139)
+++ src/plugins/contrib/profiler/Makefile.am (arbetskopia)
@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@
libdir = $(pkgdatadir)/plugins
-lib_LTLIBRARIES = libprofiler.la
+lib_LTLIBRARIES = libCBProfiler.la
-libprofiler_la_LDFLAGS = -module -version-info 0:1:0 -shared -no-undefined -avoid-version
+libCBProfiler_la_LDFLAGS = -module -version-info 0:1:0 -shared -no-undefined -avoid-version
-libprofiler_la_LIBADD = ../../../sdk/libcodeblocks.la
+libCBProfiler_la_LIBADD = ../../../sdk/libcodeblocks.la
-libprofiler_la_SOURCES = cbprofilerconfig.cpp \
+libCBProfiler_la_SOURCES = cbprofilerconfig.cpp \
cbprofiler.cpp \
cbprofilerexec.cpp
Index: src/plugins/contrib/profiler/resources/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- src/plugins/contrib/profiler/resources/Makefile.am (revision 3139)
+++ src/plugins/contrib/profiler/resources/Makefile.am (arbetskopia)
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
EXTRA_DIST = configuration.xrc main_dialog.xrc manifest.xml
-pkgdata_DATA = profiler.zip
+pkgdata_DATA = CBProfiler.zip
CLEANFILES = $(pkgdata_DATA)
-profiler.zip:
- PWD=`pwd` cd $(srcdir) && zip $(PWD)/profiler.zip manifest.xml *.xrc > /dev/null
+CBProfiler.zip:
+ PWD=`pwd` cd $(srcdir) && zip $(PWD)/CBProfiler.zip manifest.xml *.xrc > /dev/null
Index: src/plugins/contrib/profiler/cbprofiler.unix.cbp
===================================================================
--- src/plugins/contrib/profiler/cbprofiler.unix.cbp (revision 3139)
+++ src/plugins/contrib/profiler/cbprofiler.unix.cbp (arbetskopia)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
<Option virtualFolders="" />
<Build>
<Target title="default">
- <Option output="../../../devel/share/codeblocks/plugins/libcbprofiler.so" />
+ <Option output="../../../devel/share/codeblocks/plugins/libCBProfiler.so" />
<Option type="3" />
<Option compiler="gcc" />
</Target>
@@ -71,4 +71,4 @@
</Unit>
<Extensions />
</Project>
-</CodeBlocks_project_file>
\ Inget radslut vid filslut
+</CodeBlocks_project_file>
Index: src/tools/cb_share_config/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- src/tools/cb_share_config/Makefile.am (revision 3139)
+++ src/tools/cb_share_config/Makefile.am (arbetskopia)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
bin_PROGRAMS = cb_share_config
-INCLUDES = $(WX_CXXFLAGS)
+INCLUDES = $(WX_CXXFLAGS) -I$(top_srcdir)/src/sdk
cb_share_config_LDFLAGS =
Well, I wouldn't argue. My point is that little more friendliness wouldn't hurt. And if you allow me this final comment: you will only benefit from a strong community, thus the newcomers shouldn't be scared.Can you help me here? Why didn't you just search for it before asking? Is the search hard to find? Is it hard to work with?Uhmm, why are you so angry? Is there any solution to this? I searched the forums and found nothing. However there are many posts reporting this particular problem.
I 'm just trying to understand why people never search these days...
I am not angry. I 'm just trying to understand what's wrong with our search feature and no one seems to be using it.
This particular "problem" has popped up a lot lately and, as a matter of fact, the solution has been posted too many times. So please don't tell me that you searched and found nothing...
you will only benefit from a strong community, thus the newcomers shouldn't be scared.Yes, but if we work 24/7 on aswering the same question over and over again because people do not search (and this happens far to often) - there will be *no* development at all. You'll have to keep that in mind, too.
I completely agree with you. However one can simply take a deep breath and be polite.you will only benefit from a strong community, thus the newcomers shouldn't be scared.Yes, but if we work 24/7 on aswering the same question over and over again because people do not search (and this happens far to often) - there will be *no* development at all. You'll have to keep that in mind, too.
With regards Morten.
To those who read: people, please give a hand to development team.
I completely agree with you. However one can simply take a deep breath and be polite.Don't worry - we are answering over and over again, usually. But there are cases where this is just annoying and you ask yourself exactly this question: "Why don't thy search.". I believe that this is really what mandrav meant (that includes the hint to the answer). So in fact, this wasn't meant unpolite but one can take it as that, agreed. Sorry that you were the one that got hit, honestly - be patient with us, too. ;-)