Code::Blocks Forums
User forums => Nightly builds => Topic started by: killerbot on December 30, 2024, 04:39:35 pm
-
We switched to gcc 14.2.0 (on 09 December 2024) --> download the new wx/mingw dll's see link below
Get the compiler we use here : https://github.com/brechtsanders/winlibs_mingw/releases/download/14.2.0posix-19.1.1-12.0.0-ucrt-r2/winlibs-x86_64-posix-seh-gcc-14.2.0-mingw-w64ucrt-12.0.0-r2.7z
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml
Before you use a nightly make sure you understand how it works (http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,3232.0.html).
A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll(s) for Code::Blocks : https://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/Nightlies/Prerequisites/wxmsw32u_gcc_cb_wx326_2D_gcc1420-mingw64.7z
A link to Mingw64 dll's needed by Code::Blocks : http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/Nightlies/Prerequisites/Mingw64dlls14.2.0.7z
The 30 December 2024 build is out.
- Windows :
http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/Nightlies/2024/CB_20241230_rev13600_win64.7z
- Linux :
none
The current SDK version is : 2.25.0
Resolved Fixed:
Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:
-
Thanks. However, the build number is reported as 13598 when the IDE is executed, not 13600. Is this an expected behavior?
-
How much for the new version?
-
Thanks. However, the build number is reported as 13598 when the IDE is executed, not 13600. Is this an expected behavior?
yes, that is because those 2 other commits did not happen on trunk. So latest is 13600 (the number I manually pick), but trunk latest is actually (what the build process deduces) 13598.
-
What news about linux version of last nigthly ?
Difficulties with GCC 14.2.0 and /or Wxwidgets 3.2.x (3.2.2 on Win32 systems).
Thank's.
-
Is there a way to have breakpoints preserved between C::B sessions?
-
Is there a way to have breakpoints preserved between C::B sessions?
This is related, see here:
Patch 2775 - Code::Blocks History (https://alpha0010.github.io/cb-history/patches/2775.html)
-
It doesn't seem like it's made much traction as a potential feature. Oh well.