In my configuration, I have 2 (new ?) duplicated shortcuts (Ctrl-P and Ctrl-Shift-.).I had this error too. Two times exactly...
I plan to fix the conflicts soon. Any opinions about the changes in accelerators?
Quote from: killerbot on June 10, 2019, 05:36:01 amYes, head actually contains those accelerator conflicts. It's not new, it's just that cbKeyBinder 2.0 now catches them. The second accelerator of the conflicts will never be executed and the user never knew it.
indeed, what is the official statement on this, what do we suggest.
I think Pecan, you are best suited on this topic ?
I'm not sure I get a conflict on New file.
Btw: there is this report https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/840/ and I also had some error messages about bindings failing to load/save.
I don't like that Next call tip will be ctrl-n and prev call tip would be ctrl-shift-p. I'd rather change both. Or just remove the shortcuts. I didn't know these existed, I'm using up and down arrows, they work just fine, not sure what is the benefit of using the shortcuts.
wxASSERT_MSG(data == NULL,
wxT("wxMenuShortcutWalker does not use the 'data' parameter") // English only.
);
In menuutils.cpp, line 940 and 941 there is the same string. The extracting tool using xgettext see these two lines as only one, with twice the same string proposed for translation and separated by a \n. In this case, in a wxASSERT, I suppose that only the english string is needed, not the translated one. May be a better code could be :Fixed head rev 11742CodewxASSERT_MSG(data == NULL,
wxT("wxMenuShortcutWalker does not use the 'data' parameter") // English only.
);
and keep wxT (or _T) to be wx 2.8 compatible.
gd_on