Code::Blocks Forums

Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) => Development => Topic started by: tiwag on January 26, 2006, 05:34:05 pm

Title: SVN rev 1876 - Build-Options dialogue
Post by: tiwag on January 26, 2006, 05:34:05 pm
has anyone (beside me) a problem with rev 1876 when trying to open the "Build Options" Dialogue ?
Title: Re: SVN rev 1876 - Build-Options dialogue
Post by: Michael on January 26, 2006, 06:01:28 pm
No, you are not alone. When I try, I get a Code::Blocks error dialog displaying:

Quote
17:57:50: Can't create window of class wxWindowClassNR (error 1406: untergeordnetes Fenster kann nicht auf der obersten Ebene erstellt werden.)

Michael
Title: Re: SVN rev 1876 - Build-Options dialogue
Post by: sethjackson on January 26, 2006, 06:43:25 pm
Quote from: Michael on January 26, 2006, 06:01:28 pm
No, you are not alone. When I try, I get a Code::Blocks error dialog displaying:

Quote
17:57:50: Can't create window of class wxWindowClassNR (error 1406: untergeordnetes Fenster kann nicht auf der obersten Ebene erstellt werden.)

Michael


Yeah I have this same problem..... What is a wxWindowClassNR??? Never heard of that before.....
Title: Re: SVN rev 1876 - Build-Options dialogue
Post by: Michael on January 26, 2006, 06:48:55 pm
Quote from: sethjackson on January 26, 2006, 06:43:25 pm
Quote from: Michael on January 26, 2006, 06:01:28 pm
No, you are not alone. When I try, I get a Code::Blocks error dialog displaying:

Quote
17:57:50: Can't create window of class wxWindowClassNR (error 1406: untergeordnetes Fenster kann nicht auf der obersten Ebene erstellt werden.)

Michael


Yeah I have this same problem..... What is a wxWindowClassNR??? Never heard of that before.....

I have no idea unfortunately :(. May be some of the changes broke something. May be Thomas might knows what the message means...

Michael


Title: Re: SVN rev 1876 - Build-Options dialogue
Post by: mandrav on January 26, 2006, 06:51:22 pm
Fixed in revision 1877.
Title: Re: SVN rev 1876 - Build-Options dialogue
Post by: Michael on January 26, 2006, 06:58:54 pm
Quote from: mandrav on January 26, 2006, 06:51:22 pm
Fixed in revision 1877.

Thank you very much :D.

I have just finish to search about the error and understood (at least I think so :)) the cause, that it got already fixed... :D

Michael