Code::Blocks Forums
User forums => General (but related to Code::Blocks) => Topic started by: K.I.L.E.R on January 12, 2006, 09:13:20 am
-
It's only slightly better than Code::Blocks.
A noticeable difference but for a product you are supposed to pay $100 for, it aint worth it.
Code::Blocks only needs to fix the curent level of bugs, add some improvements already mentioned and add project dependency compilation and it would be on par with VS Express C++.
I've just created a project with VSE and it's code completition is on par with Code::Block's. Why is this a problem? Code::Blocks's code completition plugin has a *BUG* inside it while Microsoft's software AFAIK doesn't have a bug.
$10 says next release of Code::Blocks overtakes VSE 8?
-
Code::Blocks only needs ... add project dependency compilation and it would be on par with VS Express C++.
I don't know which version you 're using but the HEAD version supports project dependencies for some time now :)
-
It's only slightly better than Code::Blocks.
IMHO C::B is better and it is getting better each day (just looks at the resolved fixed for the nightly builds) :D. Anyway, I would not compare too much C::B with Visual Studio, because AFAIK C::B does not aim to be a new version of Visual Studio.
Code::Blocks only needs to fix the curent level of bugs, add some improvements already mentioned and add project dependency compilation and it would be on par with VS Express C++.
Which version are you using? Did you try the latest nightly build?
I've just created a project with VSE and it's code completition is on par with Code::Block's. Why is this a problem? Code::Blocks's code completition plugin has a *BUG* inside it while Microsoft's software AFAIK doesn't have a bug.
Code completion is WIP. Anyway, rikg22 has already implemented several improvements (see the nightly build of 11 January 2006).
Michael
-
I don't know which version you 're using but the HEAD version supports project dependencies for some time now :)
And it has more bugs,too! :lol:
(I'm working on some of them, btw)