Code::Blocks Forums

Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) => Development => Topic started by: killerbot on April 24, 2013, 10:57:24 pm

Title: workspace on steroids
Post by: killerbot on April 24, 2013, 10:57:24 pm
Hi,

It has been already proposed to give the workspaces more power, what do you think of the following :
- compiler options/defines on the workspace ==> applies to every project in the workspace (has already been mentioned)
- grouping of projects (aka like virtual folders), so project A, D, H go together in some group, and project B, O,P in some other group. Where the grouping makes some sense to the user, this grouping should then also be visible in the project tree


Title: Re: workspace on steroids
Post by: oBFusCATed on April 24, 2013, 11:02:38 pm
I had plans on working on this, bug got sidetracked by the ui stuff. :(
Title: Re: workspace on steroids
Post by: ollydbg on April 25, 2013, 03:59:38 am
http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/on+steroids
"on steroids" means:  in a much more powerful or extreme form :)

- compiler options/defines on the workspace ==> applies to every project in the workspace (has already been mentioned)
I love this feature. Is it related to some discussion of using some global variables (GCV, like -O2, -g...)?
Title: Re: workspace on steroids
Post by: MortenMacFly on April 25, 2013, 07:48:16 am
- compiler options/defines on the workspace ==> applies to every project in the workspace (has already been mentioned)
- grouping of projects (aka like virtual folders), so project A, D, H go together in some group, and project B, O,P in some other group. Where the grouping makes some sense to the user, this grouping should then also be visible in the project tree
For the first: Yes.
For the second: What would be a use-case?
Title: Re: workspace on steroids
Post by: oBFusCATed on April 25, 2013, 07:56:12 am
For the second: What would be a use-case?
To group related projects, like one group for libraries, one group for plugins, etc.