Code::Blocks Forums

User forums => Nightly builds => Topic started by: killerbot on May 17, 2007, 10:14:30 pm

Title: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: killerbot on May 17, 2007, 10:14:30 pm
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml

A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx283.7z


For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10.7z

The 17 May 2007 build is out.
  - Windows :
   http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070517_rev3970_win32.7z
  - Linux :
   http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070517_rev3970_Ubuntu6.10+7.04.deb
   http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070517_rev3970_suse100-102.i586.rpm (not yet)
   http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070517_rev3970_fc4+5.i586.rpm (not yet)


Resolved Fixed:


Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:


Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: Grom on May 17, 2007, 10:47:50 pm
Cool. At least we can add wxGrid to project. I would say wxGrid requires a dialog to set it up properly.
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: CyberSlayer on May 18, 2007, 01:51:07 am
This does not build on Ubuntu 7.04:
Code
./bootstrap

gives the error:
Code
configure.in:80: warning: macro `AM_OPTIONS_WXCONFIG' not found in library
configure.in:81: warning: macro `AM_PATH_WXCONFIG' not found in library
configure.in:80: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_OPTIONS_WXCONFIG
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.
configure.in:81: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_WXCONFIG

The manpage for autoconf does not mention m4_pattern_allow...  Anyone know a solution for this?
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: DreamCT on May 18, 2007, 02:43:50 am
Quote
wxSmith: Fixed bug causing empty sizers to have 0x0 size (appeared in wx 2.Cool
wxSmith has(had) a bug that default size spacer have 0x0 size in preview and real code but looks 20x20 size in editor.
Above means this bug?
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: jazzer on May 18, 2007, 04:05:45 am
Does anyone builds Code::Blocks for RedHat?
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: gghelli on May 18, 2007, 08:49:28 am
To have autoconf and automake work you have to copy wxwin.m4 from /usr/local/share/aclocal/wx to /usr/share/aclocal.
Anyway when I building codeblock on Kubuntu 7.04 I have problems with compiling src/base/tinyxml/tinywxuni.cpp:

../../../src/include/toolsmanager.h:41: error: 'class ToolsList::Node' has not been declared

I think the problem is with WX_DECLARE_LIST which seems like not working correctly. I'm using wxWidgtes 2.8.3.

Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: PsYhLo on May 18, 2007, 09:04:27 am
Quote from: CyberSlayer on May 18, 2007, 01:51:07 am
This does not build on Ubuntu 7.04:
...
no problems to me the compilation just finish without any problems
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: TheTuxKeeper on May 18, 2007, 09:31:14 am
Quote from: jazzer on May 18, 2007, 04:05:45 am
Does anyone builds Code::Blocks for RedHat?
I will build a fedora core 6 package this weekend. Don't know whether you can take this. if you have gcc 4.0 or newer, it should work.
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: afb on May 18, 2007, 09:34:20 am
Quote from: jazzer on May 18, 2007, 04:05:45 am
Does anyone builds Code::Blocks for RedHat?

Just Fedora, but it should be buildable from the source code (http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Installing_Code::Blocks_from_source_on_RPM_based_distributions).
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: byo on May 18, 2007, 01:06:07 pm
Quote from: DreamCT on May 18, 2007, 02:43:50 am
Quote
wxSmith: Fixed bug causing empty sizers to have 0x0 size (appeared in wx 2.Cool
wxSmith has(had) a bug that default size spacer have 0x0 size in preview and real code but looks 20x20 size in editor.
Above means this bug?

Thanks for pointing out. In case of spacer size should be synced (some default sizes were changed when wx2.8 was introduced), but to prevent 0x0 size spacers, it will probably have some default size set initially. Otherwise you won't be able to select it in editor (that's why I've set default size for empty sizers).

Quote from: Grom on May 17, 2007, 10:47:50 pm
Cool. At least we can add wxGrid to project. I would say wxGrid requires a dialog to set it up properly.

Simply NO, there won't be any dialog, at least in near future. As I've said before: only basic support for this item now.

BYO
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: PsYhLo on May 18, 2007, 01:43:44 pm
Code
ERROR: Plugin resource not found: libwxsmithlib.zip
Ubuntu 7.04 compile from svn 3970

how to fix it
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: Fasser on May 18, 2007, 04:38:10 pm
I've been using Ubuntu 6 builds under Debian unstable for a while now, and there were no dependency problems. Today nightly depends on libwxbase2.6-0 and libwxgtk2.6-0 >= 2.6.3.2.1.5ubuntu0.1, but if I manually change that to stock Debian libs (version 2.6.3.2.1.5), C::B still works OK.

Is it possible you change those dependencies back, or is there any BIG difference between those versions? This will allow Debian users to install (and test!) recent nightlys easily.

Thanks.
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: cstudent on May 19, 2007, 05:25:51 am
Quote from: Fasser on May 18, 2007, 04:38:10 pm
I've been using Ubuntu 6 builds under Debian unstable for a while now, and there were no dependency problems. Today nightly depends on libwxbase2.6-0 and libwxgtk2.6-0 >= 2.6.3.2.1.5ubuntu0.1, but if I manually change that to stock Debian libs (version 2.6.3.2.1.5), C::B still works OK.

Is it possible you change those dependencies back, or is there any BIG difference between those versions? This will allow Debian users to install (and test!) recent nightlys easily.

Thanks.


Support for Ubuntu 6.06 was dropped because Codeblocks would no longer build under it. Ubuntu 6.06 uses wx2.6.1 as the available version in the Ubuntu repositories and it was causing some problems. Dapper is a Long Term Support OS and the only updates the developers will do are security updates, so it will never have a higher version of wxWidgets available "officially".

But out of pure boredom, since my wife left today for Chicago for a few days, I thought I would try my hand at building a Debian package. I built this one in a Debian 4.0 (Etch) environment. I don't have Debian installed on anything, so any guinea pigs that want to test it can download it from here (http://www.mediafire.com/?1udhigx7lxj).  :)

EDIT: File uploaded to Mediafire.


Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: cker on May 19, 2007, 06:12:16 am
please see the bug about this build ....
https://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=11121&group_id=5358
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: Fasser on May 19, 2007, 10:23:33 pm
Quote from: cstudent on May 19, 2007, 05:25:51 am
But out of pure boredom, since my wife left today for Chicago for a few days, I thought I would try my hand at building a Debian package. I built this one in a Debian 4.0 (Etch) environment. I don't have Debian installed on anything, so any guinea pigs that want to test it can download it from here (http://www.mediafire.com/?1udhigx7lxj).  :)

Guinea pig report follows:

Package installs OK, but program refuses to start. If killed and started again, it displays a message box with the following message: "Deleted stale lock file '/tmp/Code::Blocks-fasser'.", which is normal given that the program was abnormally closed before. This happened from time to time with previous nightlies, but C::B usually started OK afterwards, whereas this time it just hangs there forever.

Note that your Ubuntu build from this same snapshot always started OK (didn't launch it many times, but a few of them), so maybe there IS some real difference between Debian and Ubuntu libs, at least at compile time.

Hope this helps :-)
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: cstudent on May 20, 2007, 01:58:19 am
Well, when I built the first Debian deb, it failed right at the end and I did a little shortcut to finish it. Maybe that caused the problem. I rebuilt the package again, this time no problems. I even played guinea pig myself and installed it on my Feisty machine. It installed with no problem and opens just fine. So maybe this one will work for you. If you want to try again you can grab the new file here. (http://www.mediafire.com/?3zx3bzunvai)
Title: Re: The 17 May 2007 build is out.
Post by: Fasser on May 20, 2007, 12:56:44 pm
This one seems to be OK. Launched it a couple of times with no problem, I guess everything else will be in place too. :-)