Code::Blocks Forums

Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) => Plugins development => Topic started by: bluekid on August 16, 2006, 10:05:20 am

Title: Koders searches directly from IDE
Post by: bluekid on August 16, 2006, 10:05:20 am
Quote
Koders IDE Plug-ins enable software developers to perform Koders searches directly from within the Eclipse or Visual Studio development environments by extending the reach of the Koders.com open source code index to the desktop. Koders offers plug-ins for Eclipse 3.0 and above, as well as Visual Studio.NET 2003 and 2005.
http://www.koders.com/info.aspx?c=tools#IDEs

Title: Re: Koders searches directly from IDE
Post by: MortenMacFly on August 16, 2006, 10:43:35 am
What do you want to tell us with this post? C::B includes a Koders plugin, too which does exactly the same job as the plugins you are mentioning here. Please clarify what's the point of your post?
With regards, Morten.
Title: Re: Koders searches directly from IDE
Post by: takeshimiya on August 16, 2006, 04:41:02 pm
What do you want to tell us with this post? C::B includes a Koders plugin, too which does exactly the same job as the plugins you are mentioning here.

Altrough that's not true, I think bluekid wanted to point, either that C::B is not on the list (so we can tell them), or
to implement some of it's features:

Search Koders.com faster without a browser
    * The Koders search panel is displayed as a toolbar component within the IDE
    * Search directly from the editor by right clicking on a term
    * Localize the plug-ins for additional languages

Let SmartSearchâ„¢ work for you
    * SmartSearchâ„¢ finds and recommends existing source code in real-time
    * SmartSearchâ„¢ runs transparently in the background, as you work.

Personally I don't like the two later features, but the rest are fine (especially having the results inside C::B: then would be the same as handy as the other plugins). Too bad it would requiere to use wxMozilla. wxHtml could work too, altrough with the layout a bit broken, I guess.
Title: Re: Koders searches directly from IDE
Post by: MortenMacFly on August 16, 2006, 05:33:47 pm
    * Search directly from the editor by right clicking on a term
At least this is already in SVN. ;-)
Title: Re: Koders searches directly from IDE
Post by: bluekid on August 17, 2006, 09:06:54 am
@Takeshi Miya
+1
Title: Re: Koders searches directly from IDE
Post by: MortenMacFly on August 17, 2006, 09:10:17 am
@Takeshi Miya
+1
You don't like descriptive and/or self-explaining posts, don't you?! :?
I can't do anything if I don't understand what you want. Where is the problem with writing complete sentences?
BTW: I wrote the koders plugin so I could be your point of contact...?!
Title: Re: Koders searches directly from IDE
Post by: thomas on August 17, 2006, 09:48:08 am
BTW: I wrote the koders plugin so I could be your point of contact...?!
Maybe you should start to post entire websites with your replies, too.  :lol:
Title: Re: Koders searches directly from IDE
Post by: Game_Ender on August 17, 2006, 02:39:51 pm
@Takeshi Miya
+1
You don't like descriptive and/or self-explaining posts, don't you?! :?

That is generally a very quick way to say "I agree complete with Takeshi Miya and second his idea".
Title: Re: Koders searches directly from IDE
Post by: tiwag on August 17, 2006, 02:49:30 pm
BTW: I wrote the koders plugin so I could be your point of contact...?!
Maybe you should start to post entire websites with your replies, too.  :lol:
http://www.salzamt.at/
Title: Re: Koders searches directly from IDE
Post by: mdelfede on August 17, 2006, 09:29:30 pm
@Takeshi Miya
+1
You don't like descriptive and/or self-explaining posts, don't you?! :?

That is generally a very quick way to say "I agree complete with Takeshi Miya and second his idea".

Ah, that one I didn't know too... It seems to me more and more like sms messages, something like that :
"tvumdbxo'" (italian one, but I guess there are in many languages too).

I still prefere 'good old way' of speaking, a simple "I agree with you" is maybe 3 words longer then "+1", but it can be understood without a dictionary by hand.
I scares thinking of a message like "@max, +1 -2 x3459 but /5 yes".....  :shock: