After a very tiring reinstall - spell check not working. Last suitable for working version - 9958. :'(YOu might have to reconfigure CodeBlock's Spell Check...
https://app.box.com/s/7vvac33n8l4fzliyed1v8x8cjn9cigr1
g++ (x86_64-win32-sjlj-rev1, Built by MinGW-W64 project) 6.1.0
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.After a very tiring reinstall - spell check not working. Last suitable for working version - 9958. :'(Next time please post a link to this topic http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,20195.0.html or post in the topic or post patches...
start cblauncher.exe --debug-log --no-dde --no-check-associations --multiple-instance --no-splash-screen --verboseHi, biplab, thanks for the builds.Confirmed that error message. Most likely it is an issue in CbLauncher. Need to investigate further.
I download your builds, and run it by such command:CodeThen I have such error report, see image shot below.start cblauncher.exe --debug-log --no-dde --no-check-associations --multiple-instance --no-splash-screen --verbose
(http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv194/ollydbg_cb/2017-03-05%2020%2004%2012_zpssyuvnifl.png)
It is a new warning in wx3 that asserts if the zip file doesn't contain any xrc files in it. For some of the plugins this is really the case.I'm now convinced this issue is due to multiple instances; and not due to CbLauncher. C::B is unable to find zip files and load them.
Manager failed to load XRC resource 'C:\CB_20170301_rev11021_win64\share\codeblocks\Cccc.zip'.
Hello,
In relation to software whitelist submission 4070276.
We have added this version of the software to our whitelist.
Whitelisting is file specific. A new version of your software may have new files and thus new versions of the files would not be known to us. This could result in a false positive occurring on the new files.
In order to mitigate this risk, we recommend submitting new versions of your software to us.
Symantec's decision is not a certification or endorsement of your software in any way, and you are expressly advised by this message that Symantec does not consent to you disclosing that Symantec has added your software to its White-List, or that Symantec has evaluated, endorsed or certified your software in any manner, directly or indirectly.
Decisions made by Symantec are subject to change if alterations to the software are made over time or as classification criteria and/or the policy employed by Symantec changes over time to address the evolving landscape.
Please see our software whitelist program FAQ here: https://support.symantec.com/en_US/article.TECH232956.html
Sincerely,
Symantec Security Response
http://securityresponse.symantec.com
File: C:\CodeBlocks\sf2\src\plugins\ast...\ASForematter.cpp
Line: 3229
Expression: currentChar == '+' || currentChar == '-'
int i = 1 ? 0 : 0;#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int i = 1 ? 0 : 0;
cout << "Hello world!" << endl;
return 0;
}
My wish is that the toolbars either are more compacted or somehow configurable so I can remove icons i don't use.The current implementation of all the toolbar's are "hard-coded", I mean many of toolbar are written in XRC resource files, so it is not configurable. Maybe there are some functions in wxWidgest which can hide some ununsed icons. So, patches are welcome. :)
The current implementation of all the toolbar's are "hard-coded", I mean many of toolbar are written in XRC resource files, so it is not configurable. Maybe there are some functions in wxWidgest which can hide some ununsed icons. So, patches are welcome. :)
Long time ago, I have a patch to modify and configure the CodeCompletion's toolbar, see here: Code::Blocks / Tickets / #303 make code completion's toolbar configurable (https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/303/)The current implementation of all the toolbar's are "hard-coded", I mean many of toolbar are written in XRC resource files, so it is not configurable. Maybe there are some functions in wxWidgest which can hide some ununsed icons. So, patches are welcome. :)
I just made a small experiment to see if it would work. I identified the file
codeblocks-16.01svn/src/plugins/codecompletion/resources/codecompletion_toolbar.xrc
and halved the widths of the 2 wxChoice items to 143 and 330 each, and then rebuilt Code::Blocks. That gave me a code completion toolbar half the width it was before. I still see most of what I need to see. I realize this is not a general or even portable solution, but at least it shows where the issue is.
I didn't try to make the other toolbars more compact, they still waste space in particular vertically. The main problem seems to be caused by wxChoice items in combination with much "air" around.
I didn't try to make the other toolbars more compact, they still waste space in particular vertically. The main problem seems to be caused by wxChoice items in combination with much "air" around.Hi, cacb, can you look at this thread, it looks like this is the exact issue as you stated:
I didn't try to make the other toolbars more compact, they still waste space in particular vertically. The main problem seems to be caused by wxChoice items in combination with much "air" around.Hi, cacb, can you look at this thread, it looks like this is the exact issue as you stated:
toolbar bottom edge is not shown corectly under C::B build with wx git master (http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,20938.msg143048.html#msg143048)
It is a new warning in wx3 that asserts if the zip file doesn't contain any xrc files in it. For some of the plugins this is really the case.
It is a new warning in wx3 that asserts if the zip file doesn't contain any xrc files in it. For some of the plugins this is really the case.
You are right. There is a sanity check in wx code that prompts that dialog if xrc file is missing. However there is no way to stop this assert message.
For the time being we have to ignore this harmless message till a solution is found.