As I cannot update the doc files with svn, here (http://pagesperso-orange.fr/thunderbird-noia2/userguide.7z) is a 7zip file containing the updated documentation in English and French. As told previously, I cannot do the job for german, sorry.OK - I've committed them to SVN. Than you. I've also removed the German translation as there will be nobody to harmonise 3 languages. I would also strongly suggest to drop the French translation as well, as the effort to keep the remaining two (en/fr) in sync is certainly high and I believe all coders nowadays should do well in English.
It's possible to use them directly in the htmlweb subfolder (for pdf, or chm files) also by clicking on main_codeblocks_fr.html or main_codeblocks_en.html for the html version, but if someone who has the correct rights (an admin I suppose) is able to update on C::B web site, it will be nice.I'll think about that. For me, providing a link to a PDF and CHM file on the homepage and packaging these into the installers is just fine. Why have an online documentation? Again: Its more to effort with little benefit.
Why have an online documentation?Because people are used to online docs these days. I guess.
Because people are used to online docs these days. I guess.If they are pretty. But what you get out of an automata not targeting modern HTML in the first place is not better than integrated help (like CHM/PDF) inside C::B.
it should be easy to integrate into the homepage
It's already there, in http://www.codeblocks.org/user-manual (tab User Manual on the left side of C::B main page). Sources are in www.codeblocks.org/docs/.I am aware its there already, just I did not update it yet. The single-source files are no problem, but the homepage with the multiple files is a hassle. That's what I was trying to say... :-)
In the original work, by Mario Cupelli, 3 languages were proposed,I just wanted to propose different. I think 3 languages is too much.
At least, for French, I can do the workIf that is the case also for the long-run I am happy with en/fr.
PS : I published an update of the file after my first release, with the code source of my tool at least. I have not still looked on svn, but did you use the last version (same link as previous) ?Yes, I had the most recent one but I did not commit the files I believe we don't need yet. I was able to produce all versions (PDF, CHM, HTML) just fine without the tool.
PS2: May be on Windows, WinEdt is a nice solution, but it's a shareware. Is there an alternative free solution ?For me its fine to produce the files with WinEdt at release time and that is probably enough anyways ( I usually also produce the SDK docs). Alternative tools are present, like TeXMaker, TeXStudio, TeXnicCenter or... Whether or not they also support HTML/CHM I don't know.
I build the tex files with .png, but need to transform them in .ps. [...] and it's why I restored the original .png files afterwards (at least to avoid less quality).Maybe I don't get it completely: So you say you run hlatex that uses .ps files, creates .png files out of these with low quality and these are the ones you replace with the original high-quality .png files? Right? If so, there is likely another (better) way to do it.
For the future, I can continue the work for fr/en.That is nice to hear, thank you! And yes, you can continue on the forum. If you want, I can setup this topic sticky so it remains on top. If you have important things to merge please also send me a PM as sometimes I don't manage to read all forum posts...
What is the best (and more secure) solution to do that ? I continue to use the forum ?
I hope these detailed explanations will help you to understand my work.OK - that sounds quite like a story. I do all of this directly from WinEdt w/o running tools from the command line. All this stuff, including resolving links by multiple compilations etc. is done by WinEdt. You can adopt/configure the creation process quite detailed. So it might simply be a tooling thing. The other tools I mentioned might quite well have similar capabilities. A colleague of mine is also quite happy with TeXlipse.
Happy New Year, :)Same to you! :-)
Here is a link to the full html version : here (http://pagesperso-orange.fr/thunderbird-noia2/userguide_html.7z)I'll have to find a way how to update this easily. I can only upload files one-by-one at the moment... :-/