Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

compile C::B with msvc

<< < (2/3) > >>

XayC:
It doesn't matter, and indeed it's your opinion, but I don't see why having a msvc build option makes sense if you use wxWidgets mainly on Windows and doesn't make sense if you use C:B mainly on windows. If you plan to use C:B on Windows only, to me makes sense having a msvc build option (personally though I don't need it at all, I prefer mingw).

Probably it would have been better to say, when answering to rekisum's question, that currently C:B doesn't have any msvc build option, because nobody needed it so far (and probably it's not even easy to do), instead of a "no, it doesn't make sense".

XayC

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: XayC on January 16, 2009, 03:40:14 pm ---Probably it would have been better to say, when answering to rekisum's question, that currently C:B doesn't have any msvc build option, because nobody needed it so far (and probably it's not even easy to do), instead of a "no, it doesn't make sense".

--- End quote ---
"No, because nobody needed it so far.".

Biplab:
I had once tried to compile C::B with MSVC 2005. I was using Bakefile to generate makefile and then compile using it.

But it throws some error while compiling and I couldn't succeed. I don't remember the exact error as I tried it long ago. I have a partial bakefile with which you can start if you are interested. :)

[attachment deleted by admin]

Joerg:
Hello biblap,

thanks for the bakefile.
But as msvc is not supported at all I maybe install mingw again.
Or I wait untill martind's OpenOCD plugin is available in the nightlys ;-)
At home I try to switch to Linux anyway but at work I need to use XP.

stahta01:
I am trying an Second Time to Build Code::Blocks using MSVC.
I am using MSVC9/2008 this time.

Currently have errors compiling wxscintilla DLL.

Does anyone know which wxscintilla version is closest to the one used in Code::Blocks.

Tim S

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page