The 06 January 2009 build (5382) is out.

User forums > Nightly builds

<< < (16/16)

hying:
to ollydbg:
i look the debug log like below:
----------------------------------
.....
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
> bt 30
#0 Bugtest<int> (_x=1) at E:\program\bugtest\main.cpp:7
#1 0x004013ce in main () at E:\program\bugtest\main.cpp:13
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
> info frame
Stack level 0, frame at 0x22ff4c:
eip = 0x41775b in int Bugtest<int>(int) (E:\program\bugtest\main.cpp:7); saved eip 0x4013ce
called by frame at 0x22ff70
source language c++.
Arglist at 0x22ff44, args: _x=1
Locals at 0x22ff44, Previous frame's sp is 0x22ff4c
Saved registers:
ebp at 0x22ff44, eip at 0x22ff48
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
> x/32xb 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
0x0:   >>>>>>cb_gdb:
> info threads
* 1 thread 2100.0xa98 Bugtest<int> (_x=1) at E:\program\bugtest\main.cpp:7
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
> disassemble
Dump of assembler code for function _Z7BugtestIiEiT_:
0x00417758 <int Bugtest<int>(int)+0>:   push ebp
0x00417759 <int Bugtest<int>(int)+1>:   mov ebp,esp
0x0041775b <int Bugtest<int>(int)+3>:   mov eax,0x4
0x00417760 <int Bugtest<int>(int)+8>:   leave
0x00417761 <int Bugtest<int>(int)+9>:   ret
End of assembler dump.
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
> cont
Breakpoint 2, Bugtest<char> (_x=48 '0') at E:\program\bugtest\main.cpp:7
P:/bugtest/main.cpp:7:90:beg:0x417750
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
> info locals
No locals.
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
> info args
_x = 48 '0'
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
> info registers
eax 0x30   48
ecx 0x0   0
edx 0x0   0
ebx 0x7ffda000   2147328000
esp 0x22ff40   0x22ff40
ebp 0x22ff44   0x22ff44
esi 0x16   22
edi 0x20   32
eip 0x417750   0x417750 <int Bugtest<char>(char)+12>
eflags 0x202   [ IF ]
cs 0x1b   27
ss 0x23   35
ds 0x23   35
es 0x23   35
fs 0x3b   59
gs 0x0   0
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
> bt 30
#0 Bugtest<char> (_x=48 '0') at E:\program\bugtest\main.cpp:7
#1 0x00401401 in main () at E:\program\bugtest\main.cpp:15
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
> info frame
Stack level 0, frame at 0x22ff4c:
eip = 0x417750 in int Bugtest<char>(char) (E:\program\bugtest\main.cpp:7); saved eip 0x401401
called by frame at 0x22ff70
source language c++.
Arglist at 0x22ff44, args: _x=48 '0'
Locals at 0x22ff44, Previous frame's sp is 0x22ff4c
Saved registers:
ebp at 0x22ff44, eip at 0x22ff48
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
> x/32xb 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
0x0:   >>>>>>cb_gdb:
> info threads
* 1 thread 2100.0xa98 Bugtest<char> (_x=48 '0') at E:\program\bugtest\main.cpp:7
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
----------------------------------------------------------------
at second breakpoint, no run zhe disassemble cmd,
if i send the cmd to GDB, can see the log:
> disassemble
Dump of assembler code for function _Z7BugtestIcEiT_:
0x00417744 <int Bugtest<char>(char)+0>:   push ebp
0x00417745 <int Bugtest<char>(char)+1>:   mov ebp,esp
0x00417747 <int Bugtest<char>(char)+3>:   sub esp,0x4
0x0041774a <int Bugtest<char>(char)+6>:   mov eax,DWORD PTR [ebp+0x8]
0x0041774d <int Bugtest<char>(char)+9>:   mov BYTE PTR [ebp-0x4],al
0x00417750 <int Bugtest<char>(char)+12>:   mov eax,0x1
0x00417755 <int Bugtest<char>(char)+17>:   leave
0x00417756 <int Bugtest<char>(char)+18>:   ret
End of assembler dump.
>>>>>>cb_gdb:
--------------------------------------------------
i don't know why the disassemble cmd not autorun

Jenna:
@hying

I can confirm this bug (dissassemble command seems to be not send to debug).

It only happens, if I reach the breakpoint the first time and then step over it with "continue" ("STRG+F7" or "F8"), that means if the actual and the former breakpoint are at the same line in source-code. If I step over the breakpoint ("F7") and leave the source-code line, the next hit sends the dissassemble command.

Can you please file a bug-report at berlios, so it can't be lost ?

hying:
thank jens
my english is very pool, and i am a beginner, i don't know how to send the bug-report to berlios, sorry.

ollydbg:

--- Quote from: hying on February 03, 2009, 08:22:16 am ---thank jens
my english is very pool, and i am a beginner, i don't know how to send the bug-report to berlios, sorry.

--- End quote ---

I submit this bug report. see here:
https://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=15209&group_id=5358

ollydbg:
I also filed a bug reporting the incorrect change of "symbols" panel we discussed before in this post

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version