Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

Announcement: wxScintilla is officially abandoned :(

<< < (3/6) > >>

troels:

--- Quote from: rickg22 on March 22, 2008, 09:31:34 pm ---So, if we want to adapt Scintilla to our project, then we're on our own...   :(

--- End quote ---
As of wx2.9, the original Scintilla wrapper wxStyledTextCtrl (wx/contrib/../stc) has become an 'official' wx class (wx/src/stc).
Is it really necessary to fork?
Regards

PS: wxScintilla fork

rickg22:
I recall that in the wx2.4 times, the STC editor wasn't well maintained, and wxScintilla was seen (at least by me) as some kind of blessing. But knowing we can patch it whenever we can without having to depend on a specific wx version, I feel better. It's much more convenient when you can modify the code however you like.

DrewBoo:

--- Quote from: rickg22 on March 23, 2008, 02:49:05 am ---wxScintilla is a wrapper around Scintilla. In fact I managed to compile cb with the latest version of scintilla (1.76).

--- End quote ---

Interesting.

Did you have to massage a lot of code/files?

What would the end user see on your build that is different?  Performance differences?  Features?

MortenMacFly:
Ok... I embedded scintilla 1.7.6 into the latest wxScintilla (the one of C::B 08.02) within C::B. On Windows it works, but I had to modify wxScintilla for this (as expected). Now what should I try to see if bugs got fixed / remain?!

DrewBoo:

--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on March 28, 2008, 04:53:46 pm ---Ok... I embedded scintilla 1.7.6 into the latest wxScintilla (the one of C::B 08.02) within C::B. On Windows it works, but I had to modify wxScintilla for this (as expected). Now what should I try to see if bugs got fixed / remain?!

--- End quote ---

Morten, I'm happy to help test it if you want to throw me a patch against the latest svn.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version