User forums > Help
bizarre editor behavior in 8.02 (win32)
dmoore:
--- Quote from: JGM on March 06, 2008, 04:44:41 pm ---This is funny, whats the point of creating such an endless line of code? to complicate more our lives?
A good example would be really appreciated :D
--- End quote ---
in my case it wasn't code, just word wrapped text. (some documentation i was writing)
lines were as long as 1500 characters (a long paragraph)
JGM:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on March 06, 2008, 04:56:31 pm ---We want to scramble the C::B source code. Thus put all into one file and then all into one line. This saves webspace but are (unfortunately) more than 64k characters. ;-) :lol:
--- End quote ---
I would believe you more if it was an obfuscation contest :lol:
--- Quote from: dmoore on March 06, 2008, 05:31:22 pm ---in my case it wasn't code, just word wrapped text. (some documentation i was writing)
lines were as long as 1500 characters (a long paragraph)
--- End quote ---
Thats sounds some kind of reasonable but a 64k long line, like has been talked here :?
Jenna:
--- Quote from: JGM on March 06, 2008, 06:15:33 pm ---Thats sounds some kind of reasonable but a 64k long line, like has been talked here :?
--- End quote ---
HTML pages that are optimized for size and optimized and/or obfuscated JavaScripts are other examples that make sense and can reach much more than than 64k.
JGM:
Nice example :D, I doesn't thought about that :)
Honestly, I prefer to use a tool that automates that kind of work for publishing, not manually edit infinite lines of text.
i would become more blind than I am :roll:
Ceniza:
Something bugs me... why does Martin/Morten/Mortin (you've got so many names, bloody cake) say that the wxCoord typedef is the reason for the 64k limit? Both in 32 and 64 bits architectures the size of int is 32 bits, and the size of short 16 bits. 32 bits can handle 4G...
Someone still using 16 bits C++ compilers it seems? :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version