User forums > Nightly builds
The 18 February 2008 build (4893) is out.
XayC:
--- Quote from: zgf on February 20, 2008, 02:31:01 am ---I have a problem: when I open my project by double-click the .cbp file, I can't use "Find declaration of:" or "Find implementaion of:" in the right-click menu; but when I do it with "File"->"Open", all works well.
Is it a bug !?
--- End quote ---
I have the same problem (as I stated here) and yes I think it's a bug in the CodeCompletion.
rickg22:
--- Quote from: stevenkaras on February 20, 2008, 12:05:33 am ---
--- Quote from: Wavesonics on February 18, 2008, 10:03:20 pm ---sounds like the number of bug fixes and frequency is going down a lot, does this mean we are near a 1.0f?
--- End quote ---
I hope not. Take a look at the bug tracker list. It's huge. And most of the bugs are old. Not to mention all the codecompletion bugs. I've had a hard time tracking down and reproducing them, but for the most part, I can tell that the codecompletion doesn't like default arguments. Neither does the symbol browser.
--- End quote ---
As a former developer of the codecompletion module, I can tell you that code completion WON'T be fixed until this revision is out. The code's too messy to be modified in a non-release branch. Many things need to be changed and updated.
As for the bugs in the tracker, I think it'd be better to start up with a fresh buglist. Most of the bugs there should be closed anyway.
jomeggs:
--- Quote from: rickg22 on February 21, 2008, 01:31:42 am ---As for the bugs in the tracker, I think it'd be better to start up with a fresh buglist. Most of the bugs there should be closed anyway.
--- End quote ---
Excuse me, but that's a bit weird. Most the people who wrote to this bug list had the view, that someone would act with the announced errors. That sounds like you have lost the track. Simply close the list and forget all that can't be the way of choice. I'm afraid that some important information from work from users would be thrown in the bin. So, isn't it better to close the solved and useless items?
And an note to "release or not": I'm working with different IDE's from Borland and Microsoft. They are expensive AND have a lot of bugs. Every new version offers new and more horrible problems as I can say. Codeblocks though is very stable in daily use, nearly every nightly could be labeled as stable in comparison. But there you go, I'm happy with nightlys or perhaps weeklys :lol:
Codeblocks is great, good work!
thomas:
--- Quote from: jomeggs on February 21, 2008, 01:04:11 pm ---Excuse me, but that's a bit weird. Most the people who wrote to this bug list had the view, that someone would act with the announced errors. That sounds like you have lost the track. Simply close the list and forget all that can't be the way of choice.
--- End quote ---
It was said already two years ago that the bugs in code completion would not be fixed. It was repeated many times that code completion is considered pretty much FUBAR from the bottom and that we almost certainly won't address the well-known issues in this implementation.
People still keep adding bug reports (many of which refer to the exact same issues) even today. What is this telling you?
artoj:
--- Quote from: rickg22 on February 21, 2008, 01:31:42 am ---As for the bugs in the tracker, I think it'd be better to start up with a fresh buglist. Most of the bugs there should be closed anyway.
--- End quote ---
And I hope that C::B project doesn't continue to use the Berlios' bug tracker. It just doesn't have any of the basic features you would expect from a bug tracker.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version