User forums > Nightly builds

The 27 September 2007 build will NOT be out.

<< < (2/2)

nenin:

--- Quote from: Seronis on September 29, 2007, 05:54:45 pm ---
--- Quote from: nenin on September 29, 2007, 03:47:48 pm ---At least it is time for next RC.

--- End quote ---

Except that calling it that would be lieing.  RC means Release Candidate, which means that <***>

--- End quote ---
Now this peoples downloads currently available RC2 - 1.0rc2 (dated Oct 25, 2005) It is just fine, is not it?  :mrgreen:

slasher-fun:
It seems I missed something : why are the linux releases no more "officially" published since nightly 4439 ?  :?

stahta01:

--- Quote from: slasher-fun on September 30, 2007, 11:15:47 pm ---It seems I missed something : why are the linux releases no more "officially" published since nightly 4439 ?  :?

--- End quote ---

I have no idea, but one of the people who makes the Linux builds said he was busy and will be missing some builds. This might be the cause.

Tim S

ivucica:

--- Quote from: Seronis on September 29, 2007, 05:54:45 pm ---
--- Quote from: nenin on September 29, 2007, 03:47:48 pm ---At least it is time for next RC.

--- End quote ---

Except that calling it that would be lieing.  RC means Release Candidate, which means that in the devs honest opinion "this exact release" might become the v1.0 without any further changes.  Its been very well stated that the devs have further plans and redesign issues they want to accomplish before they are comfortable calling a given revision 1.0.  So lets allow them to work at their pace and call something a  v1.0 (or an RC for it) when they are ready and comfortable doing so.

Now on the other hand if  r4500 just happens to be a really stable revision, it might be worth having someone go ahead and make a package.  But please dont call it RC3 unless it really -is- an RC.

--- End quote ---
In such case it would be good to release more properly packaged "alpha" versions.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page