User forums > Using Code::Blocks

My pretty Qt!

(1/5) > >>

incorrect user:
Hi everyone! This forum is dedicated to writing Qt-based programs! If you are interested in this you are invited to discuss any bugs/incomplete things in C::B's Qt interface in order to improve our best IDE!
By the way, who knows why C::B is not based on Qt,but on wxWidgets???Is the last one better?
I challenge you to prove this!

Regards, incorrect user ;)

incorrect user:
I need help!
It's not a secret that any Qt program must be compiled using makefile generated with qmake. But how can i automate this process in C::B?

yop:
Hi. You can try http://code.google.com/p/qtworkbench/
It is reported that due to an sdk version change the current binary win32 release is not compatible with the current night builds but I haven't checked as I 'm rushing to get some new features in.

Biplab:

--- Quote from: incorrect user on September 18, 2007, 07:40:58 am ---By the way, who knows why C::B is not based on Qt,but on wxWidgets???Is the last one better?
I challenge you to prove this!

--- End quote ---

Please don't start a flame. C::B is not based on Qt because the devs prefer wxWidgets.

You may hold your own opinion about Qt and may think it is the best. Similarly wxWidgets users do hold similar opinions about it. C::B forum is not the place to start a war between these two groups.

You're free to hold that debate in another site; but not in C::B forum.

incorrect user:

--- Quote from: Biplab on September 18, 2007, 09:01:58 am ---Please don't start a flame.

--- End quote ---

No problem, but i think that even C::B devels dream rewrite it under Qt. But, ok, let them do their own decisions!

I just want to improve C::B for convinient Qt developing.

QtWorkbench is not the best way, cause we don't need a special plugin for using qmake, we can just define pre-build steps like this:

qmake -project
qmake
make Release

and proper targets (like ./release/my_program[.exe]), and be happy, but we need to define them for each project manually. So it's quite tiring!

If we make and use the user template, i wonder about useless of Qt wizard!

I think we must correct this situation.

Regards, incorrect user ;)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version