Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

using this IDE design for an Electronic CAD

<< < (2/5) > >>

epsilon_da:
It seems like i had an old 1.0 rc2 version.
I updated to the latest windows version but this command:
codeblocks --safe-mode
is not recogniced.


I will check for SDK and double check for Scite. But it seems in the screenshots just a TextEditor with sintaxhighlighting.


Thanks.

Keyla:
Wow, I have exactly the same aim, building the greatest OSS Electronic CAD. <- no joke  :D
You are right, finding an nice GUI is tricky... I don't know if you should use an DIE like CB,Eclipse,Lazarus,... I think this will become an ugly codemix.

Other problem I/you have to solve are how to store datas DB or XML? And how about the synthetics of signals Spice vs. VHDL? There are very interesting aspects but I don't think that Im skilled enough nor that I have ever enough time to start the project realy. But if you are interested in further exchange, send me an PM.

Biplab:

--- Quote from: epsilon_da on September 17, 2007, 05:35:58 pm ---It seems like i had an old 1.0 rc2 version.
I updated to the latest windows version but this command:
codeblocks --safe-mode
is not recogniced.

--- End quote ---

It should work if you're using a latest nightly. ;)

epsilon_da:
Wow, how much was changed, codeblocks looks really nice. But i have noted some things:

Memory load on windows:
Boa Constructor (wxPython)  = 38 Mb
Codeblocks Nightly Builds = 35 Mb
Codeblocks Nightly Builds --safe-mode = 27 Mb
Codeblocks 1.0 rc2 = 18 Mb
Codeblocks 1.0 rc1 = 13 Mb

I normally use CB 1.0rc1 for C and Boa for python.
But if Boa is 38 Mb heavy being developed over python and wxPython and other libs and the new codeblocks (really really good looking) is 35 Mb. It seems like is better an much easier to program in python for large projects.

I am still testing SciTE, but i am really surprised about how quick it opens and the bunch of functionalities, i am looking right now plugins to show me more versatility. Also i am surprised about GTK, it seems like it is not more so terribly ugly on windows, and with SciTE it only is 800 kb, really nice.
I also have noted the wxscintilla.dll on the nightly builds so i am starting to think now that GTK+ will be the better choice to make the E.Schematics Control since it can be used on wxed and only gtked apps.

I will continue reading about it. Thanks.


--- Quote from: Keyla ---Wow, I have exactly the same aim, building the greatest OSS Electronic CAD. <- no joke  Very Happy

--- End quote ---
Maybe we can talk about this project. What do you think?
I am not planning starting directly right now. Before that lots of research and a wikiweb is needed.


--- Quote from: Keyla ---You are right, finding an nice GUI is tricky... I don't know if you should use an DIE like CB,Eclipse,Lazarus,... I think this will become an ugly codemix.

--- End quote ---
The best E.CAD that i have ever use is Proteus for windows and only for windows. So, i want to make something similar with some fixes, opensourced and multiplatform. I will not do everything, like simulation becouse it is already on development by other projects like ngSpice. I plan to just use it and optatively others.

Keyla:
Well it's the same for me, I start my highschool in a month, then I have good bandwith and we could discuss it.
Well even when I collected a lot of informations I have to rearange it and to make significant design decisions (language, features, modulasation,...). I never had a bigger IT project so IMHO even if I'm interested in professional programming. My electronic knowledge isn't good. More or less I like microcontrollers :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page