User forums > Announcements
Version 1.0-RC1 released!
rickg22:
ARGH!
Yup, seems the .tar.gz is corrupted. You know, I think it's time to add some quality control over here. I say Yiannis give us the link to the files and we test them. Only with approval of at least 2 people he'll release the files. What do you say?
rickg22:
I dropped the sources from the homepage (don't have sourceforge access, tho). Later we can find out what went wrong.
UPDATE: The following are the MD5 checksums that Yiannis applied on the files on his computer:
CodeBlocks-1.0-RC1.exe - 1156b82a5b855a8000e72bbf977c2458
CodeBlocks-1.0-RC1_MinGW.exe - e9902ca3c900969c31b0999d61bbef88
codeblocks-1.0-RC1.tar.gz - 77a8ce9e8dd5c770cbd35031917a02c4
codeblocks-1.0-RC1_sdk.tar.gz - 435548642c41c65c61f0d557774d23a6
It appears that the checksums of the files in sourceforge ARE WRONG. PLEASE CHECK the md5 checksums on your downloads.
darklordsatan:
--- Quote from: rickg22 on July 26, 2005, 04:22:07 am --- I say Yiannis give us the link to the files and we test them. Only with approval of at least 2 people he'll release the files. What do you say?
--- End quote ---
Agreed. Personally, it aint a big deal, but for some newcomer that downloads the file to find out its corrupted (and then probably downloads it again), its sort of a turn off.
--- Quote from: Simplemachines ---Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.
--- End quote ---
Hehe, cool!
--- Quote from: rickg22 on July 26, 2005, 04:34:15 am ---I dropped the sources from the homepage (don't have sourceforge access, tho). Later we can find out what went wrong.
--- End quote ---
Do you reffer to the fact sf is down ATM, or that you arent allowed to upload/delete/modify file releases in the project (I guess its not the case)
rickg22:
7E9A86642D41FAEC9E1A92D9C8794A98 codeblocks-1.0-rc1.tar.gz <- this is the one I downloaded. The MD5 should be 77a8ce9e8dd5c770cbd35031917a02c4. IT DOESN'T MATCH! :shock:
Must be some problem at sourceforge.
About sourceforge, i meant to say that _I_ haven't been given sourceforge access. Oh well.
mandrav:
Sorry about the corrupt source package guys. I got disconnected at some point of the file transfer and it seems that was the problem. I 'll upload the package again.
--- Quote from: Funto on July 26, 2005, 03:30:40 am ---The Wiki talks about a "patch" to wxGTK2; should I apply it to my freshly downloaded wxWidgets tarball? I don't know, I'm trying without this.
--- End quote ---
No you shouldn't needed it for Ubuntu.
--- Quote from: Funto on July 26, 2005, 03:30:40 am ---But the main problem is wxDockIt;
--- End quote ---
To build CVS HEAD, you should use Makefile.unix.wx2.6. But then again, it's got some problems still and doesn't actually work :cry:
As mentioned elsewhere, my suggestion for linux currently is wxGTK-2.4.2 with CVS VERSION_1_0 branch (that's what's included in the source package).
--- Quote from: Funto on July 26, 2005, 03:30:40 am ---I wish the Linux installation procedure is simplified in the next release, because it's nearly impossible for a poor human guy to make it work :(
--- End quote ---
Me too...
Don't worry, we 'll reach there at some point ;)
Yiannis.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version