User forums > Nightly builds
The 21 May 2007 build is out.
byo:
--- Quote from: byo on May 22, 2007, 09:22:21 am ---
--- Quote from: XenThraL on May 22, 2007, 12:12:53 am ---"ERROR: /usr/local/share/codeblocks/plugins/libwxsmithcontribitems.so: not loaded (missing symbols?)"
running Ubuntu Feisty 7.04
--- End quote ---
Confirmed. I'll look into it today. Strange it looks like wx 2.8.4 causes this to happen. But after I've checked what's the missing symbol, it's some internal data of wxChartCtrl :?
Thanks for reporting
BYO
--- End quote ---
Jay, that's a nightmare :x. Missing symbol is _ZVT16wxPieChartPoints or _ZVT18wxBar3DChartPoints and surely many others would fit here, I don't know how it's choosen.
Because of _ZVT prefix I conclude that it's missing virtual funciton table. But since classes are correct (otherwise it woudn't compile ANY time), those tables should be fine :? anybody has any experience with this stuff ? Maybe it's GCC's bug ?
Anyone
jmanson:
Hello, I have Installed the Debian package on Feisty 7.04 and am trying to use the Digital Mars D compiler on the default D application project. However, Code::Blocks is unable to find my compiler although it is installed. The error message is as follows. I tried to find the settings for the compiler, but was unable to confirm what executable CB is trying to run.
"cbtest - Debug" uses an invalid compiler [YOUR ANSWER IS ALREADY THERE. SEARCH THE FORUMS!]. Skipping...
Nothing to be done.
jmanson:
I got it working. Sorry for bothering you all.
mandrav:
--- Quote from: killerbot on May 22, 2007, 10:32:22 pm ---that remove all could be very interesting indeed just before make install : @Yiannis : what do you think ?
--- End quote ---
Unfortunately there are not many things we can do about it...
--- Quote from: byo on May 22, 2007, 11:17:01 pm ---Jay, that's a nightmare :x. Missing symbol is _ZVT16wxPieChartPoints or _ZVT18wxBar3DChartPoints and surely many others would fit here, I don't know how it's choosen.
Because of _ZVT prefix I conclude that it's missing virtual funciton table. But since classes are correct (otherwise it woudn't compile ANY time), those tables should be fine :? anybody has any experience with this stuff ? Maybe it's GCC's bug ?
--- End quote ---
The problem is not that it's about a virtual function but probably because of the size of the arguments (sizeof)...
I don't have the time to look into it atm but check what args these functions take. If the number of args is different between versions or the args themselves are different, then this could be the problem.
Miq:
--- Quote from: wxLearner on May 21, 2007, 08:50:09 pm ---Hello, I've uploaded a portable version here.
Thank you MVP for the space! :D ...
Thank you, dear Code::Blocks team, for the best IDE ever :D
--- End quote ---
@wxLearner: do you see any possibility you could that excellent job again, this time with a more recent gcc? I'd rather like 4.2 in there... ;)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version