User forums > Nightly builds
The 29 March 2007 build is out.
ir0nk0ala:
--- Quote from: cstudent on March 30, 2007, 04:15:56 am ---Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) package available here.
Although the Ubuntu package available for download here in the nightly posts will install on Feisty, I built this one for myself using the default libstdc++6 version installed on Feisty (4.1.2). I'll upload a new nightly package to the sight about once a week or so.
cstudent
--- End quote ---
Thanks for the Feisty pacakge! I just updated, and CB is definitely a necessity for me.
@ Killerbot: Upon Feisty's official release, will the 6.xx package be changed to 7.xx?
killerbot:
will check with 'cstudent' who creates the deb builds
cstudent:
Technically, the deb package 6.xx you can download from the nightly forum will work on Feisty. It's compiled using Dapper's default libraries, like libstdc++6-4.0 and wx2.6.1. It doesn't mean you can't use the c++ 4.1.2 libraries and wx2.6.3 and 2.8.1 libraries with it in Feisty. My Feisty package was built using the default Feisty libraries. I don't know if it really matters. I put Feisty on my laptop last weekend and I wanted CB on it built with it's libraries, so I just made it a package. I thought maybe others might want it. From the looks of it when I got up this morning, they must have. According to the log, I had over 3100 downloads of the package during the night!
If the CB dev's want to, I could make a Dapper package and a Edgy/Feisty package. The libraries for Edgy and Feisty are pretty close to the same version numbers right now. That package could be built with c++ 4.1.1 and wx2.6.3 and work on both Edgy and Feisty. I'm cool with whatever the dev's and community want to do.
cstudent
d1mk4:
I make codeblocks 3800 revision on my gentoo system and tested this portage and updated Wiki page.
Alturin:
--- Quote from: d1mk4 on March 31, 2007, 02:23:22 am ---I make codeblocks 3800 revision on my gentoo system and tested this portage and updated Wiki page.
--- End quote ---
There's this -huge- header saying it's instructions for getting the source for RC2.
Maybe it'd be better if you put that more down, and add it as something that's not prefered?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version