User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)

GCC 4.1.2 available (now relocatable!)

<< < (12/13) > >>

courage:

--- Quote from: nenin on March 14, 2007, 10:13:57 pm ---
--- Quote from: Grom on March 14, 2007, 09:46:54 pm ---All "official" seems to be sleeping :lol:. The last one build was unofficial too :wink:.

--- End quote ---
I`m afraid I`m to old to wait for official builds. Life is so short.. :(.

--- End quote ---

Although I am a amateur programmer(end programmer),
but I think the nightly build is always stable enough for me. :)

I think official release is not very meaningful presently,
because every bug fixed nightly build could be a certain "official build".

Grom:
Yeee official release is not important.... Specially when there is a team and you not absolutely sure in what "night" they have been frozen. The answer was to use unofficial builds... :lol: I have bad stories to say about people from my team, they are buzzy with some work and didn't have a chance to seat on forum and look for stupid new versions.

wxLearner:

--- Quote from: courage on March 14, 2007, 05:11:35 pm ---After building Ogre1.4 RC2 by GCC4.1.2, the situation became worse.
When I used prebuilt SDK, it can showed the device configuration window of Ogre samples,
but now it just threw the runtime error and left the message in Build log below:
Process terminated with status 3 (0 minutes, 4 seconds)

I just used default configuration to build under release mode with Code::Blocks and
I had some problems when compiling debug mode.
Sorry that I can't provide any useful message.

--- End quote ---

Did you compile the dependencies yourself also? Once I encountered similar problems with the MinGW gcc-DW2-3.4.5 and other libraries, that were precompiled with an other compiler, that didn't use DW2 EH. After compiling them all with DW2 EH, the problems were gone. One big advantage with DW2 was, that the binaries were much smaller. If you compile for example wxWidgets (monolithic-unicode-release-dll) with gcc-DW2-3.4.5 it's about 1MB smaller than with the usual gcc-3.4.5 release. Of course mostly speed is more important than executable-size, so I also prefer using gcc-4.1.2 now.

courage:

--- Quote from: wxLearner on March 15, 2007, 10:12:57 am ---Did you compile the dependencies yourself also?

--- End quote ---

No, I afraid I don't have time to recompile these, I use the prebuilt dependencies libraries before.
Just like TDragon saying,
"Ideally, you should be able to use your own 4.1.2-compiled programs with the 3.4.5-compiled SDK.",
in my experience, I had used VisualC7 to compile codes and link libraries that Visual6 built,
and it works fine. I think this problem is strange.
Anyway, thanks for your suggestion. :)


--- Quote from: wxLearner on March 15, 2007, 10:12:57 am ---Of course mostly speed is more important than executable-size, so I also prefer using gcc-4.1.2 now.

--- End quote ---

I also prefer better proformance. :)
Pardon me, did you build ogre with gcc4.1.2 and run samples successfully?

wxLearner:

--- Quote from: courage on March 15, 2007, 02:54:23 pm ---Pardon me, did you build ogre with gcc4.1.2 and run samples successfully?

--- End quote ---
No, I didn't build ogre yet. But I've built nearly all the dependencies with gcc-4.1.2, so I'll try soon :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page