Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

New stable version?

(1/4) > >>

happysmileman:
I don't see why there aren't stable versions of C::B available since Oct 22, 2005. There's a nightly build almost every day, why can't you just release one of those, there was supposed to be rc3 released June last year but all the download links on main site still point to rc2.

I personally don't like the idea of having to use a nightly build because I expect it to be full of bugs or errors/memory leaks.

Can someone at least point me to a fairly stable nightly build?

jimp:
I have been using codeblocks for over a year and would have to agree.  I try every couple of months to find a stable version and haven't had any luck.  It would be great to have a stable release every once and a while even if it doesn't have all the bells and whistles. Personally, I would prefer a new release a couple of times a year instead of unstable nightly builds.

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: happysmileman on February 22, 2007, 04:34:01 pm ---Can someone at least point me to a fairly stable nightly build?

--- End quote ---
I am using C::B in "hardcore" daily business under real complicated conditions in Windows and Linux. Since I know about C::B I use nightlies and/or compile them myself. I still can count the number of serious crashes in that time. If I subtract using a C::B build I *knew* it might be unstable it's no more than -say- 10 times or so. A serious crash *including* loss of data I had once only... What do you call "stable"? Try yesterday's nightly or todays. I would call both "stable".
With regards, Morten.

jimp:
Strange that you recommended today's release 2 hours before it was released.

Grom:
The stable version is a long story... Seems to be that the C::B team doesn't want to produce a new version. In therms of conspiracy theory that is meaning something.  8)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page